[A319, A320, A321] Fenix High-Fidelity Aircraft

Well, 5 - not sure that counts as a “ton”, and one of those is a note about SU13, and 2 are about further optimisation that can be done. Only the first and fourth could really be classed as bugs. So, yeah, 2.

See instructions in this post - last bullet

1 Like

Did you enter wind data into the DESCENT WIND MCDU page? Managed Descent gets unreliable quickly once larger components of headwind or, worse, tailwind are in play. Even eyeballing a wind correction is enough to improve Managed calculation to avoid those pesky MORE DRAG messages.

I am excited how fast thy came up with this patch.
For me the “rendering with iGPU” was a massive improvement in VR.
I now have a far better experience in VR after the GPU Frametime went down again and I have a smooth performance.
With the new Displays I can finally use DLSS in VR and read all fonts.
Performance wise I am very happy now.
Cant wait to see Block2 and the new EFB. I have hopes they will finaly separate refueling and boarding and by fully GSX compatible out of the box. A small detail (that can even already achieved with the great external tool “feix2gsx”), but still.

1 Like

I thought they were going to introduce incremental updates with V2. The last hotfix is still a full installation file.

Hi

Anyone works the Squak code input screen?

On pedestal at new uodate of fenix… still testing.. but no squak code to put on

I can confirm, that the squawk code is not working or at least not the display.

By the way does anyone already got a new simbrief profile for the A320 ? The old one is with 162 pax and I need a new one with 180 pax.

You have to use CLR to delete existing digits before you can put new ones.

4 Likes

Performance seems to be way better, excited for what else is to come. Thankyou!

I did have an issue importing my flight plan into the FMS though. It imports in to the iPad and I can run the INIT through the AOC menu. In the actually FMS when I select to import the flight it’s saying ‘INVALID FLT-PLN’ or something similar.

A bug or a one off?

I had this issue in V1 when flight plan included oceanic waypoints. This plane uses different coordinate format to what Simbrief generates. Not sure if this was fixed in V2.

If you didn’t have oceanic waypoints in your flight plan maybe AIRAC does not match. 2308 was released yesterday.

on the fenix discord is a section for simbrief profile. THere you will find the link to the updated profile.

Ok! Another good change

It was a simple domestic flight. Both the Fenix and Navigraph are the latest versions.

Sounds like it could be a bug then.

Hi again

Testing last version 1.5.1.200 ,using tobii Eye tracker 5 , 4k dlss3 ,all good for now

What software is the voice we hear?

The squawk code entering works fine. Just press CLR twice and it will clear the current value and then you can enter your new squawk code. I understood that’s how it works IRL.

2 Likes

Self loading cargo new version

1 Like

After the patch, perf. is way better for me. Cold&Dark>pushback on a detailed airport (INI EGLL) is just about managable. But, during pushback, perf. increases massively, and climb/crz/desc has much better perf. than before. Approach is much better/smoother too. (FSDT LSZH).
Much happier now.

The squawk code is working. You have to hit CLR twice as in the real plane

2 Likes

I like how the aircraft is now shaking and rocking through the skies. No more flying on rails.
But on approach this is quite a challange.

Is there any official advice to change the turbulence setting?
I have it on “realistic” but that was quite a ride to get it down on centerline…