I think this depends on the different flying styles of different people, me for example, I always approach with autopilot and ILS landing at all times, and only disengage AP at 100 ft before touch down for manual flaring.
So any weather conditions like crosswind, is fully managed by the aircraft’s autopilot, so the orientation of the aircraft as well as the attitude to keep within the glideslope and localiser signal to be able to land on the runway is fully managed.
Since I always fly this way, it’s difficult to pick up any issues if it doesn’t happen to me because of my flying style.
Take the Nose diving bug for example. I just tried a CAT III auto-land to HK. Whenever the AP is engaged before touchdown, the AP will always dive the nose down to the runway to catch the dipping glideslope. And I can’t recover from that. So that’s an issue.
Then I tried the exact same approach, with a slight difference, still autoland, but with assisted flare to mitigate the bug, then I end up ‘fighting’ the autopilot for control and end up with a nose dive anyway since the autopilot wins, even though there’s a slight less bounce than the first trial.
Then the third time, I approach with the same method I always do, which is full autopilot approach until 100 ft RA callout, disengage AP and the aircraft is stable, I pull back the sidestick to flare and smooth touchdown.
Now, unless someone told me to test the autoland, I wouldn’t even think that there’s that issue since I don’t fly with that style anyway. Which is why I don’t get many issues such as these, because my flying style just seems to not giving it the opportunity for the issues to even occur.