If you are wanting “Book Numbers” there are too things to bare in mind.
real world aircraft do not conform precisely to the POH and two aircraft of the same make, model, vintage will often fly quite differently from each other
regardless of how good an aircraft is on release, sim updates can change addons substantially, for example the JF Warrior was spot on with the POH when first released but is now substantially overpowered
That could have been my post! Now I am busy with the Beaver and DC-3, but since the release of the ATR is not in sight, I am waiting for the BF. And propably will pass it again…
But 414 and 310, who knows…
I’m totally biased 
but you don’t even need to spend money.
I’d like to drop my own mod for the Bonanza here G36 Improvement Project - #2623 by Albatross75160
Bonanza Hangar
Flight dynamics/performance
Engine & Fuel system
Systems
Textures & effects
Checklists
ATC
I have never been a bonanza guy, but I’ll checkout. Your work seems very impressive. Do you include performance tables/charts?
@maddormo it’s not included in the download but I used the Bonanza G36 POH found on the internet as a guide when developing. I would upload it here but am limited by the permitted file types.
The FSW 414 is a great add-on and would be at the top of my suggestion list. I flew Cessna 400 series aircraft years ago and I was blown away by what the FSW team did with the 414 in MSFS. They have since made many improvements and it seems like there is an update every other week making it better each time.
If you don’t have the Working Title CJ4, that is another aircraft that needs to be added to your hangar (if you’re on PC).
You’re absolutely right with the CJ4. But since msfs release I’ve only flown FBW and the Caravan mod. I miss so much a good propeller (no rotax). With regard to 414, it will be at the top of my purchase list for the next year. Thank you for having reminded the CJ4, I’ve almost forgotten it.
Best SIngle Engine Propellor (Rotax) - Sting S4
Best Single Engine Propellor (non-Rotax) - this was the Warrior II but it is overdue for an update, hopefully soon
The only problem I have with the CJ4 in general is that the text on the cockpit displays is rather tiny and difficult to read at normal zoom levels, compared to almost every other aircraft with glass avionics. It makes it less comfortable to fly (even with TrackIR). As such, I’ve never really flown it outside of a few landing challenges.
I don’t even have bad eyesight. Is it just me? 
I vote for the arrow/turbo arrow, but think there may be some tweaks needed as it seems a bit less “by the numbers” than pre SU10. Still very well done, trims out better than any aircraft in the game (save perhaps the 414), and flies just right.
So, 310 and DC-6?
Not sure you could do better.
The 414, glorious as it is, doesn’t have random failures and maintenance. BUT, as similar as it may look at a glance to the 310, I promise flying it is vastly different. It is worth picking up some day.
The Sting S4 is brilliant but simple. The others bring complexity. Another worthy purchase but below the other 3 for must buys.
Every other plane that flys by the numbers (except maybe the Kodiak) just isn’t as full featured.
Tiger Moth
I have soft spot for anything that transmit that the plane is alive and if you don’t take care of it, the things will break down. For me it’s an incredible immersion feature. During my PPL lessons, not only learnt to flight the plane, how to procedure in emergencies situations, but also how prevent them and taking care of the plane. It so important that, to me, it’s impossible understand one thing (to flight) without the other (taking care of the plane).
A part from jet liners, since the Digital Aviation addons, Katana 4X and A2A, the rest of the addons are very boring for me. I only made an exception with those I have a sentimental connection, like the Caravan, the DC3, the classic Super Cub or C185 which sadly never had received such level of detail (well, except the Jahn’s DC3). I suppose the developers have information about if there isn’t market for that kind of products.
For that reasons I’ve been close following the Sting. It seem the next generation for this type of addon for that range of planes. I’ve only waited if the problems with the excessive turbulence to be fixed (as it seems so). But I don’t know if I’m going to have enough budget for it this blackfriday. Right now, after all the comments posted here, the C310 is my top priority. Next the DC6 and finally the Sting.
And I want to check out the @CaptMatto Bonanza too.
Well, if you are Sting curious, know it is very well done and WAY more complex than any ultralight has a right to be in a simulator.
But the DC-6 and C310 are in another league. Definitely start with them if you can afford both.
The 310, being truly GA, comes closest to your earliest question in this thread.
I think that trio will keep me busy for all the next 2023. I hope that I won’t have to deal with too many bugs and keep me focus on learn new procedures 
Well if you want basic that appears to have nailed performance, then the Tiger Moth doesn’t get any more basic really, and actual Tiger pilots seem to like it. You’ll get overtaken by helicopters, but it’s still a glorious device to waft around in.
Totally agree, except “device” makes it sound too modern! Like an iPad 
How about “contraption”?
That would imply it’s cobbled together from a few sheets & some spare wire, and I won’t speak ill of DeHavillland 
Even if it is built of some painted sheets & a few rolls of wire…
Hehehe, good one!
One of the nicest GA single engine to fly in FS2020 