BATC Discord > TROUBLESHOOTING > troubleshooting-faq > voice test fail
Sorry cannot get copy.
BATC Discord > TROUBLESHOOTING > troubleshooting-faq > voice test fail
Sorry cannot get copy.
Already done, or at least tried. Some bot thing said it was already posted⦠Iām not the best with Discord. Iāll try again shortly.
Iāve reposted here, looks like they are collecting info -Discord
Hopefully that link works? ![]()
Also, hereās more on this issue from a few days ago - Discord
What does that mean? Which datas are missing and why?
So i got to contact limesim for their 3. party airport to solve the issue?
More than likely yes.
Iām on my 2nd flight with it right now. So far there is still a lot of room for improvement, especially with the altitudes. I was assigned an altitude of FL190 but I requested a new cruise altitude of FL170, which was confirmed by ATC. But later on, when I approached my destination I was asked to descent to FL200, which makes as much sense as anything the default ATC ever did. ![]()
Iāve only managed a few flights so far but it gets better every time. Couple of GA flights in VR (using FSDesktop to get the UI into the view) and a couple of B737 flights - latest got me vectored to a visual approach at Northolt (EGWU), just loving these vectors. Looking for a procedural approach now to see how that one goes. Sim ATC always had me too high but so far BATC has been almost perfect, just needed a little help to slow the aircraft down but thatās a B737 problem. Also EGWU doesnāt have parking for a B737 so āpilots discretionā.
well⦠it did work with FSLTL at some point in the past⦠there are literally videos of it. They probably got rid of it when they decided to do their own traffic.
You can have FSLTL running, but BATC doesnāt know/care about the traffic. Use it so the skies donāt feel so lonely, but thatās about it, AFAIK.
It will be able to use FSLTL aircraft models while using its own traffic injection to control them. Thatās what they previewd. Thatās coming later. ATC only at this time.
lol⦠no I mean literally the beyond ATC voices worked with the FSLTL traffic⦠itās not what they previewed itās what other people who had early access showed. Search youtube for " BeyondATC for MSFS with FSTL" overkill simulations has a video as well as others. This is why Iām confused as to why it doesnāt have it now⦠but probably that was before they decided to do their own traiffic.
How old were these videos? When BATC was first announced I believe it may have talked to AI aircraft. But there was a change in focus for the program. When the developers realized they could do their own traffic injector, and a more efficient one at that, they scrapped the original program and started over. This new version doesnāt recognize AI traffic. That will change once they finish their traffic module.
Didnāt BATC bring the FSLTL devs onboard to do the injector work? Or did I hallucinate that like an AI Chatbot?
Yes, they did.
As a work-around, I deleted the STAR from the Simbrief flightplan (in the editable route window) and as I re-generated the flightplan, it accepted and just vectored me in instead.
That video is BATCs injection system with FSLTL models as previously stated.
I had the same issue. Not sure if you got an answer yet, but the solution is to increase the number of clients in the SimConnect ini file. Iām not in a position where I can walk you through it right now, but the solution is on the BATC discord channel in the FAQ, I think.
Itās not very clear to me why STARs should be tied to the airport.
In my opinion, the STARs and SIDs are indicated in the AIRACs for each individual airport, and the AIRACs are published precisely to communicate updates to the procedures.
The scenary of an airport, I believe, will contain the data relating to the runways, taxyways, gates, parking and all the systems related to radio navigation, I have serious doubts that it also contains the SIDs and the STARs, then maybe Iām wrong. ![]()