Uups. … now that is really interesting.
This seems like a perfect location (example) to see that Asobo does not take the highest res sat image … and “down scales” from there to get a consistent LOD layering … but that they actually are using (totally?) independent sat images LOD image sets.
Ok, the effect could originate from the Bing side … but I think that Asobo should reconsider the strategy.
I fear that this might be a cost issue … if Asobo takes the “official” Bing data, then they only need to pay for the traffic but not for the storage. But then again … I seem to remember that initially the explanation was that Asobo does its own post procesing and that they have their own set of sat images. If that is the case, then the example from @thalixte is hard to explain (understand)
Hmm … scratching my head …