FlightSim Studio Embraer 175

There’s a new beta version available for the beta testers. Just FYI, they’re working on a fully custom autopilot. I guess that moves v1.0.0 even further now but I think that’s for a good cause.

We have been working hard to tune the autopilot. In the end, we decided to move away from the hybrid approach, as combining the default MSFS autopilot with a custom overlay does not give us reliable results. We will now begin rewriting the remaining default components to create a fully custom autopilot, which will provide improved flight director guidance and a smoother overall experience.

6 Likes

Honestly if this is what rids us of the fighter jet pitching then I’ll happily wait some more

Can’t check the new version right now but I’d assume it’s still a problem if they mention it indirectly

1 Like

Exactly my thought.

Hello, where I can find it? I opened the aerosoft app (where I purchased the aircraft) and I dont see any update availabe :frowning:

Sorry, it’s a new beta version for beta testers. There’s no new public version yet.

1 Like

Ok, thanks a lot for your answer. All clear :slight_smile: cant wait till the public update.

1 Like

Edit: in italics are bugs that are happening only under a specific set of conditions, without them the plane is working as intended

Another public version, another blogpost time - while apparently holds are now functional, I don’t know if I’ll be testing them - I’m not doing my usual WAW-WRO or reverse, instead going for a longer scheduled flight from my APL - TAP939 from Geneva to Porto
“multiple legs are now possible, but VNAV will not work on the second” FSS pls

  • good start, the radio panel has a graphics bug where the data is updated, but the screen is frozen
  • and the GSX integration froze when I called for the fuel truck, luckily the other Real Time option worked
  • the heading bug is still unwieldy, ffs FSS. The altimeter jumps by tens of hPa when adjusted on the screen, why can’t something like this be done to something that needs far larger adjustments? I’m losing hope that it will use the same binding as virtually every other plane
  • some new fields were added to the MFD, and the issue with importing performance data into the computer was solved
  • oh hey the cruise profiles are here, I’ve got my plan so I’ll stick to it but I wonder how far are they implemented
  • the TO button only activated ROLL, tried multiple times to no avail - no guidance until LNAV activation
  • I forgot to detach the chocks and GPU so this is the level of captaincy we’re dealing with, remember pilots: GSX won’t always do these for you
  • the left clickspots in the Weather panel still change the set altitude, luckily they’re useless thanks to MSFS
  • the new FD doesn’t seem to be there, as it still wanted me to pitch down on takeoff to gain speed. It also completely blew past the 250kt limit for some reason (thrust too high? I think the pitch was okay)
  • the Mach changeover on climb happened without hitch, praise be. It also reacted well to me changing the profile from Manual 300/.79 to Econ, and later to Manual 280/.76
  • interesting, the enroute climb did what I was advocating for and did not pitch down to 0 to catch the speed back - it still initially went way too far up and had to reduce vertical speed, but it went to +400-ish instead of level. Maybe I was wrong two points above.
  • oh it busted the set altitude by 200 feet while I was writing, luckily the oscillations seem lessened in this version as well. Or maybe I’m lucky because both climb and cruise are at .71
  • oh and the scroll on PFD’s airspeed doesn’t work even though the commands show up
  • the temperature compensation option is available, but it currently wants me at double the altitude at FAF (4800 opposed to 2400) at 13°, I think I’ll pass
  • aaand it begun to climb after picking “descend now” to catch the vertical profile, I don’t know what’s the correct behaviour but I don’t think it’s this
  • it really doesn’t like the 250@10000, it didn’t even try to slow down - the engines spooled down, but it kept going at 280 without a care
  • had a howler at minimums, last time I tried a missed procedure it didn’t want to cooperate so that’s a writen-off airframe. In hindsight that was a perfect chance to see if GA mode would also have not activated like TO, but alas

Overall I can definitely say improvements are being made and are noticeable, but for anyone asking if there have been revolutionary changes: not really, it’s just a better version of the last Experimental

3 Likes

Which version are you reviewing?

0.10.36, don’t know how old it is but fresh enough that I only saw it today in the installer

1 Like

I’m in the beta group and I’ve been having mostly positive experience with the aircraft with the last couple of builds. IMHO it’s finally getting to the state where it should have been like two years ago.

@Nahcep4338 Thank you for your report but as I’ve already said this forum is unfortunately not monitored by FSS. With your list opened I had done a flight SABE - SACO in E190 focused on the bugs you reported and I was ready to report them on FSS Discord. However, some of the points are head-scratchers for me as that is not what I experience with the addon.

I’m not sure what you mean here. Volume panel works fine and I had no glitches or frozen screens.

GSX worked absolutely fine for me (unlike previous non-public beta build). Boarding and pushback went without any problems. Do you use the latest GSX and/or some custom aircraft profiles?

Can you elaborate? I’m totally lost what you mean. That there is no button scroll acceleration? You can hold Shift and make it go faster.

That also works fine for me. Every time. TO button always activates ROLL for lateral guidance and TO for vertical guidance. Arming LNAV and VNAV for me.

Pitch was correctly slightly above 10 degrees for me when taking off. But your problem might be connected with the vertical guidance not set to TO.

Yes, that I can confirm. It does that for me as well. Actually the whole transition from climb mode to cruise mode is kind of wild. I wonder if that’s one of the reasons why they’re working on their fully custom autopilot.

That’s how the real aircraft behaves. At least that’s what FSS says:

However, on this my last particular flight the calculated VNAV profile was nice enough for me not to have to intervene. It slowed down to 250 kts before reaching 10,000 ft.

3 Likes

A couple of observations from my last flight…

  1. T/O check button finally works!

  2. FSS fixed probably my biggest gripe about the airplane - overly aggressive brakes when taxiing for us lay people without pedals. Now they’re less sensitive, with no lag and much easier to control

4 Likes

I write so extensively here for two reasons: one, not everyone here uses Discord and it’s better that a larger review is in place over someone else’s “nothing changed fss sux” (and since I’m not in beta FSS asked to not be sent those anyways). Two, it’s so someone can call me out for any mistakes I make like you have since I’m just an armchair peelot

This is me not looking at what I write, I meant the radio page in the FMS - I need to swap to a different one and back to see the changes, but they are effectively entered (which I could see in FSHud recognizing the value changes).
However, I seem to have figured it out: if I go back in time while I’m loaded into a flight, this issue occurs. Using Preset to go either way while on the map screen doesn’t cause this error. Neither did swapping to Live from a custom one, interestingly.

No unofficial profiles, current GSX version, if I request the fuel truck via the GSX menu the integration option gets stuck on “Loading” and eventually leaves without having loaded any fuel. Same happens when I use the EFB’s “GSX” option: it goes through the motions, but neither fuel, passengers nor cargo are loaded.

On my throttle, I have bound two settings: Instruments and Systems -> Flight Instruments -> Increase/Decrease Heading Bug. This binding is recognized and functional in every plane I fly, with the exception of FSS Embraers, and it’s a pain since I can’t always focus on just scrolling through them, or it’s too slow and I fall behind while doing it. The Shift option is more helpful but doesn’t solve the underlying issue.

Just like radio, this also seems to be a bug caused by changing time - it works properly only if I don’t fiddle with it, but is 100% reproducible if I do.
Though I wasn’t instructed to descend this time, the derate options are still very much a work in progress.

Interestingly, this time I did an early direct and the PTH was captured way before the TOD at the vertical profile, and the automatic speed of 233kt was way below the computer’s claim of 290/.7 - did not change even after I swapped to Vmo/Mmo. Also, I tried an RNAV approach and luckily I was in visual, because I would have crashed miles before the strip if I followed that. Yes I did set up the air pressures and minima on both MFDs

And this is what I meant at the start, some things I just don’t know. Thanks for pointing this out!

Yup, forgot to mention that it does, and did scream at me for an incomplete setup.

I also don’t have pedals so it was nice to see after the initial scare, but it makes me question the viability of LO autobrake even more - if it was overpowered then, I’m gonna need a space shuttle’s landing distance now lol

1 Like

For some reason you need to reverse the throttle axis’s to fly this while every other addon you don’t need to go into settings and do that every flight and my usb throttle I’m using is the thrustmaster Airbus throttle unit, and my Logitech autopilot no longer is usable with this aircraft

so is it finally getting a decent aircraft, is it recommended to buy ?
thanks

2 Likes

We are all reviewing the Experimental version. If you are comfortable installing the Experimental version from non-marketplaces sources (I use Aerosoft One), then I would highly recommend it. I notice the level of quality right away. This is a step up from many airliners in the sim.

2 Likes

I’ve just checked my aircraft folder of GSX and apparently I’m using the in-house GSX profile for the E-Jets. Maybe you could check your GSX settings if there’s something different from mine? Especially the fuel system detection etc.

Regarding the heading bug on your controller… Maybe FSS uses different binding for that? I use Stream Deck + for the rotating knobs so I don’t know. I’ll check their Discord if someone mentions that over there.

Again, I can’t confirm that. I have never seen that on any of my recent flights. Derated take-off’s are usually calculated as TO1 by the EFB and I always cross check if it’s set correctly in the FMS. I never run into the short runway situation. The same with RNAV approaches - they work ok for me, so I don’t know what can be the problem :man_shrugging:

Yeah, the automatic brakes need some tuning. I find them not so effective. I think FSS guys know about that but I suspect that’s a priority number xxx as they’re more focused on cFMS right now. I rather meant the simple manual braking with pedals (a button on my joystick in my case) - they made them much less laggy in this latest build.

Thank you for the nice discussion, anyway :airplane:

1 Like

how are the E-Jets working in VR in general, are the clickspots fine ?
thanks!

1 Like

Yeah, I just noticed the click spots are off on the MCDU. This is an SU5 issue that I believe is related to scaling. I have my Valve Index at 300%, so I’m scaling “outside” the sim. If I flip it around and use Render Scale 200% with TAA with the headset at 100%, the click spots seem to be better. Nothing scientific in this testing, just my impression.

Yesterday I made a flight with the updated aircraft and Im dissapointed. How its possible to make the final approach aat 220 knots with full flaps and no overspeed warnings and no overspeed indication at all??…. this is nort realistic… I would expect something like that from a cheap addon but not this!!!

1 Like

3 years later and its still in early access.

1 Like