AFAIK it’s planned for FS24. I’m waiting for their A321neo for FS24.
Hello are this Plane good or, not ? 
let me know..
Hey, anyone flying this thing and are able to report if you can increase the sim rate and to what extent? I’d like to use 4x time compression when flying longer legs. Not being able to use this, is a dealbreaker for me. But since I have to wait presumably anotjer 3 to 6 months before the PMDG B737 is avaiable in MSFS 2024 I’m looking for a short/mid range alternative with good systems depth. Since the FSLabs is the one with official MSFS 2024 support since the last update, it became very attractive. But I can’t find anything regarding the sim rate anywhere. Perhaps someone in this forum can help me out?
It’s a very good plane but the new version for 2024 has the problem that not bright in FMS screen
1 Like
I use an application that works fine, sorry but I don’t remember the name
Not true. The FMS brightness is fine in MSFS2024. It’s dimmed by default when starting a flight and BRT button must be used to increase the brightness.
1 Like
thinking about purchase for MsFS2024 but my question is
Is it better than fênix A321?
should I wait the BFU from fênix?
Any advice for those who are flying both planes
Appreciate…
It’s a matter of taste. I love Fenix but I purchased FSLabs A321 just out of curiosity. And I must say that I love it even though there are some small bugs I encountered (not game breaking ones though). In term of a simulation depth I find FSLabs superior to Fenix (yes, that’s right) - it has MEL, a tech log, even your windshield gets dirtier during a flight, deep ACARS simulation, an absolutely great weather radar and an even better GSX integration and it reportedly also flies in a way closer to the real thing. The hand-flying is really something. I also love sounds, especially cockpit ones, like system beeping, switches etc.
It’s imho inferior to Fenix in the graphics area. Some switches lack animations (they “jump” between their end positions), inside and outside textures are not as sharp as Fenix’s. If you don’t mind spending 70 USD without VAT then I recommend it because for me it re-ignited my interest in this aircraft. I’ve been fed up of Fenix, or more precisely Airbuses in general.
4 Likes
so this is better than fenix are, you mean the same… its cost Total: Original price: €79.95
I agree 
I actually have the Fenix A320 myself—picked up FSlabs out of curiosity, and I’ve really enjoyed flying it. Personally, I prefer it when paired with GSX for ground handling realism, and I also use it alongside SayIntentions.AI, which adds a lot to the immersion with ATC and intercom functionality.
That said, I do think it comes down to personal preference. Some simmers might be perfectly happy with what they already have—especially if they’re getting good performance and the features they value most. The Fenix does offer a deep level of system simulation, and if you’re already content with your current setup, there’s really no need to buy fslabs A321 just for the sake of it.
Ultimately, it depends on what someone values most in their sim experience—whether it’s realism, ease of use, performance, or integration with add-ons like GSX and SayIntentions.AI. For those who are happy with their current aircraft, there’s definitely no pressure to buy.
I know there was that old malware scandal, but I honestly don’t care (my personal opinion)—it’s in the past. What matters to me is how it flies now, and FSLabs really delivers. for me. No regrets.
Disclaimer: I am no real world pilot but FSlabs has the edge personally.
2 Likes
Thanks mate gonna Wait for the BFU from fênix.
1 Like
