Where did I mention SU5? That’s rather my point, we’ve been through 5 updates and these pretty fundamental errors still haven’t been fixed, and who knows if/when they will be. And several of them were affected by SU5, none of them for the better. Does it make it better if they’re not caused by SU5? That they’ve had a year to fix them and haven’t, and instead introduce new bugs? Every bug I mentioned is real so it’s quite tiresome when people respond with semantics and are more interested in trying to catch you out than improve the game. ‘oooh but SU5 didn’t too that, gotcha hahaha now you look stupid!’ as if it matters.
We’ll have to agree to disagree with whether photogrammetry is still broken, the issue is absolutely nowhere near fixed, take a flight over London. I’m not sure what gives you the impression it’s mostly fixed.
I’m intrigued some of you ‘might not have had any issues’ given that these are completely uncontroversial, it’s been acknowledged they are there. Do you somehow have a different version of the game? Perhaps it depends where you fly, as I say, if you’re flying high in areas without photogrammetry it won’t affect you, but I don’t particularly see what it adds to tell us that. It’s like me saying, I don’t have a problem with the 787, because I’ve never flown it. Not particularly useful feedback is it?
These bugs are real, and given experience over the last year people are obviously getting very anxious about whether they will ever be fixed, so yes will keep raising them until they are to ensure they are noticed and prioritised over scenery updates and movie tie-ins. If an issue doesn’t affect you because you don’t use the bits of the game if affects, but it is a matter of record that it exists and needs fixing, why not just stay out of it and stop muddying the water?