- Identifier - KMIA
- Name – Miami International Airport
- Category – Grounds and Facilities
- Description – Most of the terminals structures are missing, can only see a floating roof.
Some jetways are incorrectly located, they collide with the aircraft.
Gate 74 as example:
LFPO Paris-Orly Airport
Missing terminal 1,2,3 but jetway are in the good place but no building.
- Identifier - OMDB
- Name – Dubai Intl
- Category – Textures
- Description
Extreme texture (building roof) flickering on some buildings, see marked examples.
SU3 beta 1.5.1
Seems like there have been some recent changes to SBFL, but there are still quite some issues:
- new gate names incorrect
- stands on new apron missing
- jetways incorrectly aligned
- jetway links missing
Teheran Mehrabad Intl. airport (OIII):
If I choose to start on the west end of the southern runway (11R) my airplane is positioned so it faces away from the runway, heading west instead of east. The communication thinks I am on runway 29L when I should be 11R.
The location markers are obviously mixed up. The northern runway is OK.
Was like in this in SU2 already and still is this way in SU3 beta.
EG4LA Frimley Park Hospital Helipad Incorrect location
Helipad has been located on top of the car park and NOT on top of the Main A&E building opposite
- FGSL
- Malabo
- Grounds and Facilities
- Description – New passenger terminal and associated taxiways/gates missing, but present in aerial.
- UACC - ICAO designation being the primary or IATA/FAA designation secondary if an ICAO designation doesn’t exist. Leave blank if none are available.
- Astana Nursultan Nazarbayev Intl – Location’s name per official website, aeronautical chart, or publicly available government source
- Grounds and Facilities
- Description - Gates and taxiways not adjusted to terminal extension, jetway alignment incorrect
- EDVK
- Kassel Calden
- Runway and Taxi Ways
- Gap and Cliff in the scenery
- Latest SU 2 - XBox Series X
This is supposed to be fixed but it is not: https://forums.flightsimulator.com/t/edvk-terrain-mesh-issues-taxiway-l/716017?u=tomesch1982
-
OBBI - ICAO designation being the primary or IATA/FAA designation secondary if an ICAO designation doesn’t exist. Leave blank if none are available.
-
Bahrain Intl – Location’s name per official website, aeronautical chart, or publicly available government source
-
Grounds and Facilities
-
Description – Jetways not adjusted to match new terminal layout
-
ZGSZ
-
Shenzhen Baoan
-
Grounds and Facilities
-
Description – No jetways at satellite terminal, stand alignments not accurate
I was very pleased that with the beginning of 2024 my home airfield was created with a little more attention . It looks like someone at Asobo likes it and there are chairs, tables, sunshades, trailers and gliders. SO I was very happy about that!
However, over time and after SU1 and SU2, more and more errors have occurred.
- there is also a small balon hovering there. At first I thought it was quite nice and it would be a nice decoration for the flying days, but normally it should not be there.
The same applies to the trailers standing near the runway in the east at the beginning. This is the landing zone. You can see them in the picture Trees-1.
-
with the start of FS2024, the terrain in front of the hangar slopes very steeply. In reality, you can see a very slight curvature there, but nowhere near as much as in FS2024. The area could be better levelled in terms of height.
In addition, the surface there is very uneven, making it almost impossible to roll there. It needs to be smoothed.
-
bushes have suddenly appeared in the parking area over the last few weeks. This is not at all acceptable.
As you can see in the satellite image, there is a small row of bushes, which was also shown correctly at the beginning.
-
as far as the trees are concerned, they were fine until SU2, but now the Shadow border in the west is full of trees
and in the west there is a huge flight path in the forest that goes all the way to the motorway, as can be seen on the satellite image from Bingmap, the forest there has not been cut down.
A more recent picture from Google shows that a small bitumen runway was recently added there. That would be the Cream topping .
Thanks for an adjustment.
If necessary, it should be at least as good as it was before.
We Germans call this a ‘Verschlimmbesserung’.
You can’t translate that into one word, but it means that an attempt to improve something has made it worse than before.
As always, happy flying!
PS The community folder was empty, of course!
- ZHEC
- Ezhou Huahu
- Missing Airport
- Description – Airport is missing, no underlying aerial that shows it though
LSHI Inselspital
- Identifier – ICAO: LSHI
- Name – Inselspital Bern
- Category – Helipad
- Description – Helipad is to small. it can fit multiple helicopters in reality. you can see the right size under the MSFS generated one.
To do:
- creater a larger deck
MSFS:
Reality:
SOURCE:Rega 18 | Facebook
LS3X8 Hospital Riviera-Chablais, Hospital De Rennaz
- Identifier – ICAO: LS3X8
- Name – Hospital Riviera-Chablais, Hospital De Rennaz
- Category – Helipad
- Description – Helipads are split in two uneven surfaces which should be one big pad the size of three normal pads. 2 helipads with an unmarked pad inbetween
To do:
- create one big platform hosting 2 pads and some spare room.
MSFS:
Maps:
Identifier: EGWC
Name: RAF Cosford/COSFORD AB
Category: Closed to civil aviation. Not a commercial airfield.
Description: RAF Cosford is a military airfield and used for training purposes. According to the attached document below, it is not open to civil aviation until further notice. Career mode missions use this destination.
Career mode uses tons of military airfields for missions. They are never in the MSFS Flight Planner. Many of them are labelled with a couple of letters and then a couple of numbers. Never an Icao code. Please either add these to the flight planner or remove them from mission destinations/beginnings. If they are in the beginning they often cause a restricted airspace ding.
Hi @Pilotfirst9999, that’s outside of the scope of this topic, please report it as a separate bug or contribute to an existing topic for this issue
Does that include my post about RAF Cosford being closed to civil aircraft, or is that allowed to stay on this topic?
Cheers,