MSFS Dev Q&A Highlights: NEW A320neo, Sim Updates, and More!

Looking forward to the iniBuilds A320neo! What are you looking forward to?

Everything! :+1:

4 Likes

Wonder if FBW and Inibuilds are collaborating on the new A320N?

2 Likes

Another A320 is a little odd to me. I would personally have thought Asobo could have contracted someone to meaningfully improve the base sim A320 (mostly for the XBox users since PC users can go with FBW or Fenix) and then have more of the remaining resources/money go into a plane not yet in the sim.

1 Like

Atmospheric changes and snow fixes.

2 Likes

That’s what they’re doing. It’s separate because of the activities and landing challenges ingrained with the old one. They’ll then have new landing challenges with the new aircraft.

Yeah, I get that. I would have voted for fixing the in-sim A320 and releasing an A340 rather than adding another A320.

It’s ok if they break all the challenges. That’s what they did after the 747 updates where the engines shut down when you try a landing challenge :rofl:

Wait, we’re getting 10 new PG cities, Copenhagen being one of them even though it already was a PG city and yet Stockholm isn’t there?! That tech was developed here for god sakes, it was the first city to get PG maps and despite a second nordic updates the entire region of Stockholm will still look as ■■■■■■ as it has been since day 1??! The ground textures all have a green tint which makes the whole area look like crap.

So you didn’t watch the whole video? Your answer is there. Stockholm will be added. It’s awaiting military clearance. Min. 2 months for clearance.

2 Likes

No, they talked about Gothenburg, nothing was said about Stockholm.

Well, it’s a challenge isn’t it? :slight_smile:

No. Why do you think I said it in the video? I don’t make stuff up. Jorg said it later on in the stream. Rather than watch a 10-minute video, spend an hour and 24 minutes watching the full live stream.