New Release: Pilot's Boeing B314 "The Clipper" Flying Boat

Pretty sure! Says knots right on the guages (in the front panel and at the Navigator’s station.) All the references in the manual are in knots and the book “Long Way Home” always references knots.

As a side note if anyone is interested, I did some testing today with the HudBar add-on which shows configurable data in a separate window. Fuel flow reference should indeed be gallons per hour not lbs per hour like the manual states. When using gph, the cruise settings from the manual (MP/RPM settings based on altitude and weight) matched the expected data presented in HudBar (airspeed and fuel flow) very closely in both the 314 and the 314a. HudBar has EGT readouts too which make it possible to set the mixture rich or lean of peak (though I had mixed results with that.) Seems the data is good under the hood. It’s just not getting relayed properly through the guages. Really a shame. This should have been a great add-on. It’s not terrible but definitely not what it could be. I wish I knew how to code!

Civilian aircraft used MPH until 1969 (I googled it), so I’d wager a very small amount (because it’s just wiki) that it SHOULD be MPH, and the reference to knots in the aircraft and manual are wrong! I’m willing to be proven wrong. If it is that way, it would hardly be the first time something like this came up!

Failing to find a good resolution picture of the real aircraft instrument panel, it’s a fairly forgivable mistake, but I do not believe Boeing was using knots at that time.

1 Like

Certainly not trying to pick a fight but here’s an excerpt from the book “The Long Way Home” about the Boeing Clipper that flew from Auckland to New York instead of heading back to Hawaii right after the Pearl Harbor attacks:

Bob Ford glanced quickly at the airspeed indicator. Seventy knots - the design-rated landing/stall speed. As the airspeed needle crept above that mark he gently brought the wheel back. The Clipper’s bow rose above the horizon but it did not break off the water. He let the wheel forward again. With the bow down he could see the edge of the gorge 1,700 yards away. More speed, he needed more speed to break the suction. He kept the nose down, hoping to build up the airspeed.

Fifty seconds now. Sixty. Seventy. Then he decided. If we don’t break off in another twenty seconds I’ll pull back three engines but keep Number One at full power. Its torque will swing us around and we can head upstream. All eyes on the flight deck were fixed on the rapidly approaching gorge. No one uttered a word. Ford adjusted his grip on the throttles. He flexed his left hand. At that moment NC18602 came off the water.

But the reprieve was only momentary. They barely had flying speed and were not climbing at all, just hovering a few feet off the surface and still headed toward the gorge.

“Ninety one seconds” Swede Rothe called from the engineer’s station. “That’s past max time for full power. Can we pull it back now?”

“No way! Keep those throttles to the stops. We’re not out of this yet!”

“Okay, but the cylinder head temps are over redline! We could blow at any time!”

Ford did not reply, but thought to himself: Hell! We’ll either blow up or hit those rocks. Either way we’re dead. Might as well die trying. And he kept his hand hard against the throttles. Gingerly he tested the yoke, attempting to find a balance between pulling back too far and risking a stall and maintaining just enough nose-down attitude to build up the airspeed without settling back on to the river.

At that moment they passed the rim of the gorge. The river dropped away into the rocky defile and the water turned to white foam as it crashed against the boulder-strewn bottom. Without the cushioning effect - the so-called “ground effect” - of being only a few feet above the water surface, NC18602 also began to descend into the gorge. In seconds they were flying within the confines of a narrow canyon, still not too far above the surface. But the extra separation from the water surface did allow Ford to drop the bow a little more and gradually the airspeed began to pick up.

“Eighty five knots,” John Mack called out.

Okay, Ford thought, that gives us about five knots to play with to get some climb out of this baby. Gently he exerted enough back pressure on the yoke to raise the nose and drop the airspeed to eighty knots.

1 Like

Fair enough. Maybe the fact that it’s a flying boat changed things. Boats used knots?

That’s what I’m thinking. Perhaps flying boats tended to lean into the “boat” term and use knots? It would make some sense since they maneuver on the water.

Great book

2 Likes

You know who’d be able to definitively settle this? The developer. He’s a self-proclaimed expert on the 314. How strange for him to be absent…

4 Likes

Here’s another excerpt from the book “China Clipper” (Gandt):

“In Juan Trippe’s view of his airline as the “chosen instrument,” Pan American was to be an airborne maritime service…Its spirit and traditions would be naval and nautical. Its seagoing aircraft were to be called clippers, after the fast, full-rigged sailing vessels of the nineteenth century. Speed was measured in knots. Periods of airborne duty were called watches. The men who commanded Pan American’s clippers were given the title of captain. Copilots were first officers. Instead of the typical flyers’ attire of riding breeches, leather jacket, and silk scarf, Pan American pilots wore black, naval-style uniforms and white officer’s caps.”

Juan Trippe himself had been a U.S Naval Aviator circa 1917-18. I think the legacy on modern aviation instituted by Trippe/Pan Am as described in the book excerpt above can’t be overstated.

5 Likes

That clears it up! Thanks.

2 Likes

On their Facebook page Pilots claim the B314 isn’t abandoned and that they “are planning to bring a comprehensive update to the PC version of the B-314 not too long after the expo in Vegas”

As the B314 is my all time favourite aircraft I really want this plane but would never buy it in it’s current status. here’s hoping it gets the attention it deserves.

2 Likes

Thanks for sharing this info.

I will keep my :crossed_fingers:t4:!!

It’s been in its current state for almost a year. While I’d like to see improvements, the 314 is my favorite flying boat after all, I’m not getting my hopes up.

Agreed. I would never buy any Pilots product if the B314 ends up abandoned.
The tragedy is that it’s unlikely another team would invest in building another B314 as it already exists in some semblance.

2 Likes

IF? It already is. Unfortunately. Another Boeing aircraft CaptainSimmed.

2 Likes

And yet another interesting AC in the sim which will most likely now never get a high fidelity version.

1 Like

How very wrong you are!

I’m happy to announce that PILOT’S B-314 - The Clipper v1.7 Beta is now available to those who wish to test it.

The ChangeLog is as follows:

All models

Fuel pressure code updated.
Flight engineer panel fuel flow gauge needle animation fixed.
Flight engineer panel fuel flow gauge code updated.

Please download the update via your account at the PILOT’S website:

https://t1p.de/q9byl

I will be working through various other bugs | fixes in the coming days, as we also get ready to make the PILOT’S B-314 available for Xbox.

As always, I look forward to your feedback.

Jerome

11 Likes

Thank you!

Thank you, so much, for not abandoning this aircraft! It is so deserving of your attention and refinement and I’d love to be flying it more often.

I’m really looking forward to the water physics improvements for 2024, where the 314 can really shine.

2 Likes

Awesome! Wicked exciting!
I was hoping you guys would bring many of the improvements Microsoft developed for the La Couterie 630 into the plane, 2024 should make it even better!!!

By download, I assume you mean just download our order again?.. Got it… I got confused at first how to get to the download, but I figured it out… (pull down at the top)

3 Likes

Great news!

1 Like

People who own the module, sell me on it please.
What are the best features?
What still needs to improve?

1 Like