Famous Flyer I: Beechcraft Model 17 Staggerwing

[Megadyptes7635]

Well the Ju wasn’t actually developed by Asobo, they got a third party to do it like with the Fokker and this Beechcraft. But still Microsoft published and produced so I guess you should expect them to follow some standards but seems not.

@LameLefty

You don’t “over stress” an airframe by opening a side window in a low altitude, low speed GA aircraft.

I know that and I know it’s stupid. I’m not making excuses for the way the flight sim handles damage but just explaining that’s the way it is.

Here’s one of the devs of the Kodiak explaining it

Open a Window or door inflight causes aircraft crash - Kodiak 100 Skydivers Version

This is a core sim problem. When an exit is opened in mid-air, one that uses (A:EXIT OPEN:index, percent), the sim considers the aircraft overstressed. This is wrong, already reported and known to Asobo. However, as more aircraft start making use of openabke exits, this should probably be addressed. There is no such thing as aircraft being destroyed due to overstressing from opening an exit in reality, even with compressed cabins.

Open a Window or door inflight causes aircraft crash - Kodiak 100 Skydivers Version

Yes, this has been reported and is known to be documented as a bug. @darshonaut that is a possibility. The default TBM that Mugz enhanced uses Lvars for the exits, which are harmless. Our decision to use Exit Simvars instead of Lvars is multiplayer. When the exits become visible in MP in the future, we want other people to see them open. We were aware of the problem but as it is a core problem of MSFS, we decided that future-proofing was the best route.