nhc150
February 26, 2023, 12:15pm
42
barbra6456:
I’d like to see some support for your claim secondary claim that it will somehow “stress the memory controller”, which is utter nonsense, especially if you’re using matched pairs from the same manufacturer. “Stress the memory controller” … I actually did a search on that term and most people dismiss the claim out of hand, and with some motherboards supporting 8tb or more of ram, the idea of stressing the motherboard is utter nonsense in 2023.
# Table of Contents
- [Table of Contents](#table-of-contents)
- [Setup](#setup)
- [Memory Testing Software](#memory-testing-software)
- [Avoid](#avoid)
- [Recommended](#recommended)
- [Alternatives](#alternatives)
- [Comparison](#comparison)
- [Timings Software](#timings-software)
- [Benchmarks](#benchmarks)
- [General RAM Info](#general-ram-info)
- [Frequency and Timings Relation](#frequency-and-timings-relation)
- [Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Timings](#primary-secondary-and-tertiary-timings)
- [Expectations/Limitations](#expectationslimitations)
- [Motherboard](#motherboard)
- [Integrated Circuits (ICs)](#integrated-circuits-ics)
- [Shorthand Notation](#shorthand-notation)
- [Label on Sticks](#label-on-sticks)
- [Corsair Version Number](#corsair-version-number)
- [G.Skill 042 Code](#gskill-042-code)
This file has been truncated. show original
As the total count of ranks in a system increases, so does the load on the memory controller. This usually means that more memory ranks will require higher voltage, especially VCCSA on Intel and SOC voltage on AMD.
With more DIMMs and/or dual rank DIMMs, the expected frequency can be lower.
In other words, more sticks = more load on the memory controller. More sticks = lower maximum frequency. The same holds true for DDR5. This is common knowledge.
1 Like