SimWorks Studios Kodiak 100 one the best aircraft for MSFS 2020

If they did a Tecnam p2012 traveler it would probably join the Kodiak as the best airliner :slight_smile:

I definitely cannot disagree about that. Especially when drink is involved.
I bet the Venn Diagram of football hooligans that also make YouTube videos about flight simulators has a pretty thin overlap though :laughing:

2 Likes

Your video was very timely for me.

I’ve managed to get my head around how to fly the Kodiak pretty well until I discovered yesterday that I hadn’t landed it in crosswinds (just by dumb luck flying with real weather). It was windy yesterday during a couple of flights and my landings were as miserable as the first in your video.

I know you’d already talked about the material in your video in previous posts in this thread, but watching you perform them was extremely helpful. Now I just need to practice.

Glad that I waited to post this one. Tried your slip method in 10 and 15kt crosswinds from about 60 degrees off my left side. Magic! I’ll throw in gusts and other stuff later.

1 Like

Yeah, it’s nice but I tend not to use it. I fly G1000-equipped aircraft IRL and the knob/buttonology with my button box, save for that function, is second nature.

The slip /low wing method works really well for the Kodiak. As you could see I was using crab for the initial approach and then going into the slip on short final.

One thing I didn’t mention was that it increases your vertical speed (more drag), so more power needs to be added. But the extra drag can be useful too when a steeper approach is required - I’ll often use it to help clear trees on bush strips even when there is no crosswind.

1 Like

Huups, what’s happen here?
See Airspeed

image

I’ve noticed that on several aircraft with the G5 emulation

That’s not a G5 though. It’s an ESI-500. The Kodiak couldn’t have a G5 IRL for certification reasons. It’s only for use with relativity basic low seat count aircraft.

I remember this being a bug in an earlier version of the Kodiak but I thought it got fixed. Do you have the latest version?

It’s still a thing, I have the latest version from the Marketplace and the bug is still there

Fair enough, thanks for the info! Point is, I’ve seen it on more than just the Kodiak.

No worries. Perhaps they share the same bugged code.

It’s been there for more than a year, and it also happens in other airplanes.
It’s documented in the known issues page.

Since SU10 some numbers on the ESI500 are displaced.

This is an MSFS bug that was introduced in Sim Update 5 when using NanoVG. It has been reported to Asobo here: https://devsupport.flightsimulator.com/questions/6681/bug-problems-with-rendering-of-xml-gauges-in-nanov.html. That is a developer-only forum, so please refrain from posting there.

Can we talk about the Autopilot for a minute? There are some rather glaring omissions and incorrect behavior that I’ve observed, but the worst is the complete lack of stall protection, and in fact quite the opposite, the AP behavior actually makes stall conditions worse if you don’t catch it and disable the AP in time.

The real Kodiak’s AP has stall protection built in. It will not pitch up enough to cause a stall.
In the sim, especially on ILS approaches, I’ve crashed more than once due to error on my part exacerbated by the AP trying to pitch up more and more to absurd limits which causes a stall. This should not happen. Worst case it should nose over and fly into the ground :stuck_out_tongue:

If you mean the GFC-700 Underspeed Protection and Electronic Stability Protection packages that the IRL Kodiak uses, yes - these are not implemented. Nor is Control Wheel Steering and various other IRL features. Maybe in a future version?

Until then - dont forget to apply power at the bottom of descent. I modded my G1000 using SPAD to get the 200ft aural tone, which can help if you have become distracted with another task.

Yes those are exactly the features I am referring to (And thank you now I finally know what ESP stands for lol! I had a hell of a time trying to google that)

My problem is consistently (which probably says something about me) when moving to flaps 2 or most often flaps 3 on approach. I either forget to throttle up or don’t throttle up enough for the new configuration and next thing I know the AP is rapidly pitching up and up and up to try and stay on GS and if I don’t catch it in seconds its all over. Stall and not nearly enough time to recover.

Would love to know more about that. There are a lot of these settings in the G1000 settings page that seem unable to be set

At flaps 35, set your torque for c1000ft-lbs.

Don’t use the AP at speeds less than 100KIAS (IRL limitation and wise in MSFS too). And I suggest dont use it less than 500AGL.

Getting the tone is not a feature available in the sim. You have to use some 3rd party driver software like SPAD.next to play a suitable sound when you are crossing 200ft of your target ALT SEL. Its not that hard to do in SPAD (paid version only)

Don’t use the AP at speeds less than 100KIAS (IRL limitation and wise in MSFS too). And I suggest dont use it less than 500AGL.

Yes but at this point I’m still slowing down and well over 100 when the flaps start going out, and only dropping below as a result of my mistake and at that point I’m panicking :stuck_out_tongue:

Generally what happens is I’m about 130, starting to slow down, do indeed put in about 1,000 torque and flaps 1 around 130 knots. Then flaps 2 around 120. But around this point a series of events starts happening too quickly for me to have fully absorbed it but I think something like this is happening:

  1. 120 knots and flaps 2
  2. The aircraft balloons a bit (The autotrim for flaps either is also not implemented or just plan too weak IMHO)
  3. The aircraft slows down quite quickly, and the AP starts to pitch up quickly which compounds the issue and next thing I know I’ve gone from 120 to 80 knots in a couple of seconds!

At this point even full throttle won’t save it because as a TP there is a delay in torque plus the AP is still pitching up more and more and more to try and stay on GS even though it is impossible.

So really I just need to drop the AP MUCH sooner, but I hesitate to do so on ILS landings because of either visibility or crosswind conditions that are causing me to use ILS in the first place.

Getting the tone is not a feature available in the sim. You have to use some 3rd party driver software like SPAD.next to play a suitable sound when you are crossing 200ft of your target ALT SEL. Its not that hard to do in SPAD (paid version only)

Ah I see what you mean. You aren’t actually doing anything to the G1000, just reacting to the sim data. I’ll look to see if AAO can do that with scripts, but I’ve never looked at writing a script that can react to data as opposed to being driven by events so not sure if it can.

I usually apply the flaps as per limits and let the AP deal with the re-trimming and I focus on power management. But for flaps 35, I’m almost certainly be out of AP by then.

It’s just practice - know that full prop RPM and full flaps is like throwing out an anchor!

1 Like

Good time to try the Kodiak & Flotiak


(from SWS Discord):

7 Likes