Perhaps we will get exactly that. One of each type to push/prove Accusim 2.0. They also said I think that P3D was done in terms of dev so they may also want to revive some of those aircraft for MSFS.
Time will tell.
That would be great! The P47, AT-6, Piper Cub, Iād be happy 
1 Like
Just shows how we are all different. Warbirds are just not my thing. I have zero interest in any of those and would much rather have the Aerostar. The Comanche was the obvious first choice for A2A but what next is the burning question.
1 Like
Yup, doesnāt have to be a warbird, I just love Radials and the Accusim versions were simply amazing 
the Aerostar is my current favourite to come as well 
The default DHC 2 beaver is steam gauge with different nav radio/gps options, itās pretty nice to fly
3 Likes
You sound like someone who values other peopleās opinions and doesnāt stick to dogma. So I guess Speaker of the House is definitely not in your future 
1 Like
I think so, if theyāre doing 2 planes a year, weāll probably get their next offering in Q2 2024. I imagine the new MSFS will probably come out Q3 or Q4
1 Like
My Reims Rocket mod will have its glass cockpit replaced with a gauges cockpit soon
But nothing to be compared with WBsim or A2A
3 Likes
from what I saw in an interview, they are expecting to be able to release about 2 planes per year, now that the core work on accusim, and the learning curve with the Comanche are behind them. So yes, I would expect 1 or 2 more
1 Like
In answer to your original question, the WB-Sim 172SP is your answer. There are some excellent twins and complex singles, but the 172 as modified by @WeptBurrito2749 has everything you need.
2 Likes
WBSim 172. Itās the only one I fly, but it might be based on the Premium Deluxe C172?
You mentioning WB-SIm and A2A in the same sentence, is praise indeed (for both Developers )
1 Like
How about an analog Reims Rocket mod FOR the WBSim C172?
Yeah I was refering to the quality they provide in their products, Iām an humble amateur
Have you considered using FSX instead?
Have you considered not posting instead?
3 Likes
For those talking about the 182 RG did they ever fix the hobbs meter? It reads completely wrong last I knew - which was admittedly quite a while ago. It showed 1/100th hours on the rollers but only counts in 1/10th. Iād buy it if I knew for sure they fixed that. Small to most probably, but would bug the heck out of me.
Youāre absolutely right that newer is better - and typically safer. However, Iām a private pilot working on my instrument rating. The planes I rent tend to have a mix of steam gauges and glass, but mostly steam (alt., VSI, turn coordinator and DG). So I want to sim with the closest thing to what Iāll be taking my checkride in. Plus, VORs/NDB can be a backup if the GPS fails. Thatās the basis of my particular interest in steam gauges. That said, I did just buy a glass cockpit transition course.