Yes, of course - but I don’t know if they didn’t overdo it a bit or if they didn’t use the necessary data or if the data is not “that cheap or easy to get”. Maybe also a “performance” problem!
And I think some people here realise that it’s not that easy, of course it’s not - they want to make us all happy - and that’s really not easy 
As I said, I would just like to have confirmation from the team - not just “yes it doesn’t work properly, but it´s amazing” - what was that referring to in the Q&A ? - it seemed to me that they are “happy” with the result on the whole and it’s only “small” things that don’t work at the moment according to SU7 - but it’s much more, wrong clouds, completely missing cloud types, hard transitions, constant “cauliflower” clouds “everywhere” - generic transitions between stations that might look good in the sunset but are completely wrong, no cloud fronts (storm fronts with thick multi-layered clouds), suddenly disappearing “fog-layer” etc. etc. !
2 Likes