Why are there so many trees in FS2020 that have big chunks taken out of the middle? Like millions of giraffes have been roaming the entire world

I scarcely see trees that look that way in real life, but many probably 1/3rd of trees in fs2020 have a massive chunk taken out of the middle.

I can understand some variation in the vertical ordering of branches and some gaps here and there, but the way it’s done in the game is just way over the top I think.

Also, in the UK, FS2020 currently believes 70% of trees are triangular-shaped/pyramidal pine trees when in reality they are scarcely found in most of the countryside. Having lived here all my life, I’d say it’s at least below 15% of if not 5%.

1 Like

I never noticed any trees eaten by giraffes. Maybe you could post some screenshots please?

4 Likes

51% of UK trees are conifers.

2 Likes

Probably 90% of that is in a few isolated forrests.

If you’ve walked in the countryside in the UK, you know that these trees are not even 1/4 as common as they are in fs2020.

I’ve been around the UK, I live here and have done all my life.

1 Like

Trees are one of the things that MSFS does really badly IMHO.

Wrong place, wrong type, wrong size, wrong coverage.

6 Likes

The only thing they do really well is hide the poor quality of the bing data

8 Likes

I also live in the UK, also have done for all my adult life and I have also walked the countryside but also suggest I’ve only seen less than 5% of it so could make no judgement of how many trees there are and of what type. I can only go on what data the Forestry Commission and Woodland Trust put out. 51% of trees in the UK are conifers and majority are non-native.

You can argue all you like but I’ll take that data before your anecdotal evidence based on an incomplete sample.

You also state 70% of the trees in the sim within the UK are conifers. Have you flown and examined every tree in England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and all the islands in the sim? No, thought not.

1 Like

Oh come off it, it’s the best representation of trees in any current sim.

I mean would you genuinely notice if the trees were accurate anyway? Would you change your mind if it meant dramatic hits to performance just so the tree outside your house is rendered correctly?

Colorado (where i live) is filled with Pines, Spruces and Firs. But i’m not going to make sure each tree is accurately placed and represented correctly in game because one, there are a lot of f***ing trees in Colorado and two, if i’m flying that close to the ground, my focus is not crashing into the ground, not making sure that tree over yonder is like the tree it represents IRL.

A tree is a tree my dude, you’re flying in the air anyway…

5 Likes

Neither the “tree people” nor the “cloud people” will ever be happy with the sim IMHO!

3 Likes

Any screenshots to show us what you mean?

Is this what you mean by that dark gap line through the trees on the shore line?
Otherwise, I don’t see this distortion very often during low level flying. Click on photo to zoom in.
Example:

It’s propably because of the millions of giraffes roaming the earth these days.

2 Likes

Sounds like what we are really missing is giraffes.

2 Likes

Always an excuse for a giraffe pic

5 Likes

I’ve flown across most of the UK.

On average, it’s about 2/3 - 3/4 conifer.

In real life I work around trees, I literally cut down trees for work.

I’m a park ranger. These types of trees just aren’t that common.

Round/oval/spreading tree types exist almost everywhere, but tall thin trees are fairly uncommon in the countryside or the cities.

And like I said, most of that 51% is probably from a few big forests in Scotland or somewhere.

1 Like

Yeah, those trees close to the shore have gaps in the middle.

That’s like that everywhere in fs2020. it’s odd.

Almost any time someone shares a comparison photo of MSFS and real life, I look for the trees.

I had always just forgiven this because it is better than anything else.

But it would be really cool if we could get some shorter and more varied trees. Almost everywhere. This would still be imperfect like autogen scenery, but it is cool to imagine improved trees.

1 Like

What we really need are “Speedtrees” or whatever is the equivalent in use today. They’d also respond to the wind etc.

A new sim due out soonish features this.

That still leaves the problem of getting the right tree in the right place. Which is where we came in.

1 Like

no speedtree pls, cost way too much performance.