True. The data is being updated all the time. Piece by piece. Area by area. Care to try to guess how long it will take to update every square mile of new data that is being added. And by the time you get half way through, there is new data available.
This is a continuous process that will never be done. The issue raised by many is that their favorite area has “much better imagery” available than what is being used in the sim. Who gets theirs done first? You bring up an example of a couple square miles of New York. I can show you 100s of thousands of square miles of reasonably hi res scenery in the browser that is brutal in the sim. It covers almost all of Canada from about 55 degrees and north. I would really like to see that fixed before they upgrade some little peninsula in New York.
Who’s complaint is more important? How do you decide?