DC Designs F-14, F-15, or new default MSFS?

Yes. The F14 will follow a flight plan using either Nav or Heading hold. I really enjoy flying it, whether carving a canyon or making supper sonic transcontinental runs.

4 Likes

Yes same here the F14 follows the NAV mode really good, altitude is solid too and speed is very good as of now. Yes the afterburner is somewhat okay but not a beauty.

1 Like

I mean fighter plane belong to fighter sim like DCS
 ! Dont expect too much in MSFS !

Then stick to DCS. As for this sim, the many happy flyers of miljets like the F-14, F-15, F-22 and Hawk would beg to differ, as would the flyers of WWII warbirds like the P-38L (what a glorious plane!), the Spitfire, the Corsair, etc.

Flight sims are for flying, and some of the planes available for MSFS are wonderful.

4 Likes

But a fighter plane is just as at home and as welcome in FS as it is in DCS. This debate tends to go round in circles and is always utterly illogical.

2 Likes

MSFS is about aviation, so every airplane is fair game, and this is an MSFS forum so DCS has as much relevance here as Goat Simulator.

9 Likes

Great. Thanks. This helps. What is cruising altitude and cruising mach of DC Designs F-14? Can it cruise close to, at, or above Mach 2? Does the F-15 also follow NAV?

I noticed the DC Designs F-14 has gotten excellent reviews, but the F-15 mediocre (just better than Eurofighter). Not sure why?

Look, you seem obsessed with long-distance, high-altitude supersonic cruising. These are tactical air-superiority fighters not “mini-Concordes”. The F-14B model can hit about Mach 2.4 at FL400, and the F-15C can get to about Mach 2.5 at the same altitudes. But these speeds require afterburner, which uses fuel at a prodigious rate - you won’t hit those speeds with maximum fuel (external tanks), and if you fly them “clean” on only internal fuel, you’ll still run out in well under an hour, probably closer to half that. You can “cheat” and add fuel via menus and such without actually slowing down, landing and refueling, but in that case, why not just cue up a time-lapse international flight cockpit video on YouTube instead?

If you want a supersonic airliner capable of trans-Atlantic flights, wait for the DC Designs Concorde, currently targeting February (ish). It was supposed to be this year but SU5-7 have really stuffed up plans for lots of developers.

2 Likes

No modern fighters, with the exception of the ( real life ) Eurofighter Typhoon, can “cruise” at supersonic airspeeds - they’re capable of them, but as the above reply explains, you won’t last long in terms of fuel etc. They’re fighters and are really supposed to be flown by hand.

CodenameJack447 has done awesome work in enabling the autopilot to support higher airspeeds, but even the real F-14 has only a very basic autopilot system like most fighter jets. What you’re asking for isn’t really a part of these sorts of aircraft at all.

Regarding the F-15 reviews, the early stuff seemed to focus on appearance which was not as polished as it is now - it took time to learn MSFS and so reviews were harsher as it was considered the first “proper” attempt at a fighter aircraft in MSFS. Since then reviews have been much better as it has evolved - and will continue to do so with next years’ big update for them.

4 Likes

“Obsessed” is a bit of a harsh word. It’s that if I’m going to pay hard earned money for payware, just want to understand what it can and cannot do. In reality, will probably use it more for high speed maneuvers, but if one has added benefit of being able to cruise long distances at high speeds (even if the real life version cannot due to fuel constraints), it is an added benefit of that particular money spent.

So the F-14 has long term NAV capability. Thanks to all who answer the question - appreciate it. Does the DC Design F-15 have this as well, or just the F-14?

Completely understood. And yes, completely understand the reality of the aircraft and that it is primarily meant to be flown by hand.

With that said, do you happen to know if the DC Design Payware also supports autopilot with high speed cruising and “LNAV” or “NAV” to follow a long haul route? If so, I will happily purchase at least one of these before the black friday sale ends. Thanks!

The F-22, Rafale, Gripen (barely) and the Su-35 (upgraded Su-27, although this may be for a future variant not actually ones in current service) can also supercruise.

But again, not with external stores and not very long/far. I believe the OP mentioned “New York to Cape Town” or something similarly impossible for any tactical fighter. For that matter, I believe routes of that length are impossible for the Concorde too, though I haven’t plotted the great circle distance.

Thank you. Yes, this works! For really long haul flights, where I want to run errands or do other things while it crosses the ocean, I can do a “Direct GPS” option in the pre-flight screen and it seems to hold it.

Unfortunately the default F-18 only cruises at 933 knots (about Mach 1.4), so will have to go to Payware to get closer to my desired Mach 2 cruise. But at least I’m able to get the autopilot to work.

Thanks for your testaments to realism. I do acknowledge and understand them. That said, want to enjoy the occasional Mach 2ish cruise on “something” flyable, so before I pay $$, just want to know if either the F-14 or F-15 can handle this (following routes planned in the pre flight loading MSFS interface, whether IFR-low, IFR-high, or GPS, etc). Apparently the F-18 can, it just is a bit slower than I’d like (Mach 1.4). From some of the reports, it looks like the F-14 may be able to do this. Still haven’t heard back on the F-15.

The F-15 can pretty much do the same, autopilot wise, as the F-14. The same team developed both. @DEAN01973 (the “D” in DC Designs) has already weighed in above. The autopilot stuff is all the work of @CodenameJack447. He can clarify if there’s any nuanced differences between the two planes in terms of what functions and features may have been implemented in one versus the other.

Apparently the Concords max range is about 4500miles. A NY to Cape Town in one leg is asking way too much I think.

1 Like

Yes, of course, I know it is not realistic!

I’m just trying to have fun when I do that type of flying - unlimited fuel option in MSFS settings when I do that so it doesn’t run out of fuel. I don’t have 15 hours with my responsibilities, but a Mach 2 - 5 hour-ish → take off, set it into cruise, set the AP to “LNAV”, “NAV”, etc. and hold altitude, have fun with friends/family (eat dinner, watch movies, play games, whatever) after everyone goes to bed, watch a quick sunrise, descend, and land. I’ve also done a NYC to NRT. Takeoff in the evening and land late afternoon in NRT (after the family has gone to bed).

Yes, it’s totally an unrealistic “game” use case, but before I spend $25-30, I just want to know directly if either of these specific payware will allow me to do that. If so, will happily buy one or the other.

Apparently the MSFS F-18 does allow me to do that, but it only cruises at Mach 1.4. The Eurofighter very much allows this, but it’s handling leaves much to be desired.

I have both the F14 and F15, can definately say you’ll never touch the Typhoon again afterwards. I have said this before how they’re all good in their own unique ways including the Hornet. @DEAN01973 has a long term vision with DC’s products and the aircraft will receive updates over time to make em the best they can be. Either way you go, you’ll get insurance and you won’t be disappointed. Let’s not forget that we have F16’s on the way to.

4 Likes

Thanks. Glad to hear that DC is committed to their products.