i am flying the A320 all the time and it works …
did u do the updates / downloads as described on github?
i.ex. i did a python update after i followed all instruction coz that info showed up that there is a new version
I noticed that it doesn’t work for Bush Trips. And I second onkelyogi’s suggestion of having vertical line(s) for the point(s) of touchdown.
Can it store multiple landings so if you do a series of touch-and-go’s you can review them later?
it only shows the last one and is overwritten with the next imho
>3G = “Sends you a RyanAir application.” 
1 Like
@GiausarDraconis: Could you please try two things so I can pinpoint the cause of your issue:
- Try opening the localhost:5000 URL in a different browser and see if it works.
- After landing and bringing your plane to a halt, load the following site in your browser: localhost:5000/_stuff and check if you see any numbers under VERTICAL_SPEED_LANDING_LIST and/or PLANE_ALT_ABOVE_GROUND_LIST.
Let me know, once you try it out. Thanks!
@BuildableSea96: Thanks for the feedback regarding the Bush Trips. I will have to try it myself. In theory, there shouldn’t be any issue with Bush Trips. As @onkelyogi4210 already said, currently MSFS Landing Analyzer overwrites your last landing results with new ones.
@Topper1988: Thanks for responding!
- I have tried Chrome, Edge, and Firefox. Doesn’t seem to make a difference.
- localhost:5000/_stuff brings up this: {“AIRBORNE”:true,“G_FORCE”:0.98,“G_FORCE_LANDING”:“N/A”,“G_FORCE_LANDING_LIST”:“N/A”,“G_FORCE_LIST”:[0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98],“LABELS”:["","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","",""],“LANDING_COUNTER”:0,“LANDING_RATING”:“N/A”,“PLANE_ALT_ABOVE_GROUND_LIST”:[14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5,14.5],“SIM_ON_GROUND”:1.0,“SIM_ON_GROUND_LIST”:“N/A”,“VERTICAL_SPEED”:0,“VERTICAL_SPEED_LANDING”:“N/A”,“VERTICAL_SPEED_LANDING_LIST”:“N/A”,“V_SPEED_LIST”:[0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0]}
The landing was made in a 787 using ILS approach at Tokyo Haneda Airport. I fast travelled to final in my flight plan.
I suspect it has something to do with either a) the 787 (which I don’t have so I can’t test it) or b) with fast traveling. I’ve sent you a private message with regards to this so we keep this thread relatively clean. I’d appreciate your help in fixing this bug.
i got the 787 … u wanna me to do a test flight? any specific route or approach?
first ILS after today’s update, very smooth, however again above 2.5G …
Topper, there is something wrong imho …
Great idea. As a 40+ year CFI, this could be useful. Thank you.
Al
@onkelyogi4210 Thanks for the help! Could you please try the 787 at the Tokyo Haneda Airport. Just do a little take-off and landing make sure you’re at least 10 seconds airborne.
I think I know where the problem lies. It’s the -999999 values being read by SimConnect. The same one you see im your graph occasionally. Now we have to find out the reason why it’s happening - my initial guess is lower FPS. Then I hope, I’ll be able to fix the issue @GiausarDraconis has.
787
Tokyo Haneda ILS 34L
{“AIRBORNE”:true,“G_FORCE”:0.98,“G_FORCE_LANDING”:1.58,“G_FORCE_LANDING_LIST”:[0.92,0.9,1.21,1.34,1.58,1.45,1.19,1.11,1.04,0.99,0.96,0.94,0.93,0.93,0.93,0.93,0.94,0.94,0.95,0.95,0.95,0.96,0.96,0.96,0.96,0.97,0.97,0.97,0.97,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.99,0.99,0.99,0.99,0.99,0.99,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.05,1.08,1.1,1.23,1.18,1.1,1.04,1.03,1.03,1.03,1.03,1.02,1.02,1.02,1.01,1.01,1.01,1.01,1.01,1.01,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,0.99,0.99,0.99,0.98,0.98,0.97,0.97,0.97,0.96,0.96,0.96,0.95,0.95,0.95,0.94,0.94,0.94,0.93,0.93,0.93,0.92,0.92,0.92,0.92,0.92,0.91,0.91,0.91,0.91,0.91,0.91,0.91,0.91,0.91,0.91,1.03,0.98,1.03,1.48,1.45,1.26,1.04,0.91,0.86,0.86,0.86,0.85,0.92,0.94,0.99,1.04,1.14,1.15,1.1,1.03,0.97,0.94,0.93,0.94,0.96,0.99,1.01,1.03,1.04,1.02,1.02,1.0,0.99,0.98,0.99,0.99,0.99,0.99,1.01,1.0,1.0,1.0],“G_FORCE_LIST”:[0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98,0.98],“LABELS”:["","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","",""],“LANDING_COUNTER”:1,“LANDING_RATING”:“Poor landing”,“PLANE_ALT_ABOVE_GROUND_LIST”:[19.8,18.3,17.3,16.6,16.3,16.5,16.9,17.6,18.3,19.0,19.7,20.3,-999999,21.3,21.6,21.8,22.0,-999999,22.3,22.3,22.3,22.2,22.2,22.1,21.9,21.8,21.6,21.4,21.1,20.8,20.5,20.2,19.9,19.6,19.4,19.1,18.8,18.5,18.1,17.8,17.5,17.2,16.9,16.6,16.3,16.0,15.8,15.8,15.8,16.0,16.2,16.3,16.5,16.7,17.0,17.2,17.5,17.8,18.0,18.3,18.6,18.9,19.2,19.5,19.8,20.1,20.4,20.7,21.0,21.3,21.6,21.9,22.3,22.6,22.8,23.2,23.4,23.7,24.0,24.2,24.4,24.6,24.8,25.0,25.2,25.3,25.4,25.5,25.5,25.5,25.5,25.5,25.4,25.2,25.0,24.8,24.6,24.3,23.9,23.5,22.9,22.5,21.9,21.3,20.6,19.9,19.2,18.3,17.4,16.7,16.2,15.8,15.6,15.6,15.8,16.0,16.2,16.4,16.4,16.4,16.3,16.2,16.0,15.8,15.6,15.5,15.5,15.5,15.6,15.7,15.8,15.8,15.8,15.7,15.7,15.6,15.6,15.6,15.6,15.6,15.6,15.6,15.6,15.6,15.6,15.6,15.6,15.6,15.6,15.6,15.6],“SIM_ON_GROUND”:1.0,“SIM_ON_GROUND_LIST”:“N/A”,“VERTICAL_SPEED”:0,“VERTICAL_SPEED_LANDING”:-504,“VERTICAL_SPEED_LANDING_LIST”:[640,644,606,564,504,423,341,250,171,999999,48,4,-26,-49,-61,-67,-68,-65,-59,-52,-45,-38,-30,-21,-11,-1,9,18,29,42,52,60,68,75,81,87,93,98,103,107,112,115,118,120,122,120,116,108,93,73,55,39,24,10,-4,-18,-30,-41,-51,-60,-69,-77,-84,-90,-96,-101,-105,-109,-112,-115,-118,-120,-122,-124,-125,-126,-127,-126,-126,-125,-123,-121,-118,-114,-108,-103,-96,-88,-80,-72,-63,-53,-42,-30,-16,-3,11,26,41,60,80,97,115,132,152,172,192,211,234,254,255,251,239,215,182,148,118,94,77,67,62,61,63,65,68,68,62,52,40,30,22,18,17,17,17,18,18,17,15,13,11,9,7,6,6,6,6,6,6,6,6],“V_SPEED_LIST”:[0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0]}
Thanks for the input! Seems like the issue @GiausarDraconis has is caused by the -999999 values. Do you know what FPS you had during the 787 landing in Tokyo? My assumption is that the -999999 values are related to dips in FPS.
Anyways, I’ll try to do a hotfix to and let you know, once it’s finished.
1 Like
havent watched fps, however i could do the flight again with afterburner on and u join my discord watching the stream …
It’s working perfectly! In the computer and smartphone.
Congratulations, excelent work.Thank you 
The devs and microsoft should pay you or at least recognize you
Can you make it so that a reading of -999999 will instead use the previously known value? Worst case is it would show as a straight horizontal line for that short bit.
That’s what I’m working on. If all goes well, a new version should be out tomorrow. This will fix the -999999 bug plus add chart visualization improvements.
2 Likes
Hello,
Sorry to bother, but I don’t know if it is a bug or me. When I start a flight, i run the .py file and the landing is recorded well. When I make a second landing on that flight or make another flight, the localhost website doesnt show the values of the new landing…
You’re not bothering at all. 
It’s certainly not the way the tool is supposed to work. It should automatically draw new charts with after a new landing.
I’m planning on releasing a new version tomorrow or on Friday which will come with several bug fixes. I suggest you wait and see if it works with the new version. Thanks!
3 Likes
Thank you so much for the work and effort!
2 Likes