All this work
All this passion
For graphics only
If those of ASOBO manage to fix the avionics a bit in the next few months, I swear Iâll go up on my knees to kiss everyoneâs feet. 
they set a goal to create a GAME to attract the masses, and with that they did succeed, but do not call this train wrack a flight simulator, because itâs not.
2 Likes
Youâre right, for now
We hope that the project for X-BOX does not prevent him from working a little on the AIRCRAFT
We all look forward confidently 
I presume you are referring to the A320.
Mod or Default?
Do you have deadzones set on your controller axis?
Anything in your community folder?
But I wonder about that strategy⊠This âGAMEâ is not a game really (no purpose), and not really a sim yet. Itâs in limbo. I guess time will tell, and if they just abandon the title. Flight sims have never had âmass appealâ. The niche it fills, has a devoted bunch willing to spend their money and time. But I wouldnât say itâs a large audience.
Asabo/MS certainly generated the buzz prior to release with the PR videos they released. Tons of youtube creators under NDAâs pumping out amazing videos as well. Sims have an appeal for me now, but even as a kid I would fly under a few bridges and try to land on the empire state building. Then probably not play it for a few months, going back to my (then better looking) first person shooters and real time strategy games. Time will tellâŠ
MSFS simply has sweet spots for imagery you can create or come by luckily.
Juggling cloud coverage type, season, time of day lighting and shadows.
My moments never look as good as the developer footage either though.
1 Like
The entire planet, meaning the bits of it with decent Bing and height map data. Or maybe large parts of Northern Canada, Greenland, Russia, Africa, Afghanistan, India, China, Indonesia, Australia, South Pacific and other Island nations, etc arenât part of the planet!
Itâs great, just a tad variable in quality, from
to
Hi @TheSevenflyer,
Iâm using completely a completely stock Premium Deluxe FSIM experience. Nothing in community folder.
This issue is very prevalent on A320, but also happens with other aircraft as well. On a straight line segment iâll find that the airplane will deviate slightly from flight path. Then the deviation will slowly grow to an attitude appropriate only for the RAF Red Arrows or USAF Thunderbirds.
I have deadzones on the joystick. I can tell itâs not a joystick problem because I get the AP DISC horn only after overriding the AP with manual input. Shouldnât be getting these attitudes in Flight - Normal Law mode.
My guess, is it feels to me as if the computer has lost position and is deviating to correct a âperceivedâ anomaly, then loses sight of what the target is. Maybe itâs gotten so far off that it gets confused on the right âintercept pathâ to the projected flight path.
Iâve seen similar strange behavior on other planes approaching a waypoint. Perhaps an issue with overfly vs fly-by mode?
The default ASOBO autopilot is very susceptible to micros signals from a controller, that when released does not return to exactly dead center, or is dirty. These signals confuse the autopilot and it will not work correctly.
If this is what is happening in your case, this is a suggested way to set the sim up to prevent this issue from happening.
With the sim running, if you are on the start up screen, from the top heading, select âOptionsâ, or if you are already in the sim, press âESCâ on the keyboard.
- Under âGeneralâ
Set âFlight Modelâ to âModernâ, not âLegacyâ. - Under âAssistsâ
Set all âPilotingâ assists to âOffâ ( AI handling Comms can be left on, if used) - When you are in the sim, from the âwingedâ sim icon, Open AI Control (icon to the right of the yoke icon), and ensure that âControl Aircraftâ is âOffâ (button placed to the left).
- Next, and quite important, is to add deadzones to each axis for all your controllers. Approximately 5 to 10 % should be enough, but there have been instances where significantly more was needed.
Try this, and let us know if it helps!!
1 Like
@TheSevenflyer I concur⊠I switched from a CH yoke to a CH stick, and had all sorts of AP issues at first. Forgot to set my dead zones, and make absolutely sure my stick is calibrated regularly. Everything was better after that. You donât want any ârogueâ inputs to the AP during flight or it will geek out.
1 Like
They are not, my msfs looks amasing to, and with yourcontrol (shared cockpit) nothing is even close,
Well, the C152 was flyable since day one. Or is your question like âall airplanes flyableâ and even ârealisticâ?
I assume the full Daher TBM930 POH will never make it into MSFS 2020. But a little propeller drag maybe?
Great video. What an astonishing achievement MSFS 2020 is! Mindboggling!
I have to ask. Are we defining âflyableâ using the traditional definition of âable to be flownâ? In which case, all the airplanes in MSFS are flyable.
Or are we using some other, millennial definition of âflyableâ? Iâm just looking for clarification.
Everyone talks about how great the world looks. IMO, it doesnât look all that amazing. The mountains look melted, the PG is awful, the water is tiled, the snow sticks to roads but not fields. I could go on. What I am saying is that they hyped it up so much, and delivered a portion.
I know, I knowâŠâgive them timeâŠâ
This topic was automatically closed 30 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.