Hello, I open this thread to let you know that the distributor Aerosoft and its new CRJ 500 \ 700 is a real shame in the modeling and exterior textures, it is embarrassing after paying the price of the plane, the flight model is quite good and successful but what happens abroad? What happens in those liveries? Apparently they are fine but when you make a camera drone and zoom in on the detail it looks HORROROUS with all saw teeth, it is shameful that a supposed official distributor makes these planes without the same graphic quality as for example those of asobo-microsoft, even the planes carenado have incredible exterior finishes !! I wanted to make it clear that I play at 4k ultra high with an rtx 3080, i9 10900k, and 32gb of ram, after paying so much money for that plane I feel disappointed, does anyone else think the same?
This would probably have more impact if you posted this on their forum instead of here.
If you are right, but I open this post here to make people know and avoid buying products of this type since at least MINIMUM they should have the graphic standard and textures of the default aircraft and boy … that does not come close to it. more minimal
To give an example from another video game, it is as if you buy a weapon or a skin of a weapon in call of duty, the tests are going very well the weapon, but it looks badly blurred and that it is not at the height of the same weapons graphically
It is not that I live from the graphics, but I think that after paying more than 50 euros and more being an official distributor, I find your product unfortunate because I did not expect it
Since the OP just wants the community know about this problem and the potential customer base is at least 100 times larger here than at the Aerosoft forum, it was the right choice, from his POV.
I highly disagree with you. But I sense that you’re only posting to get attention. So, mission accomplished.
Do you have any screenshots of these issues you’re facing?
Maybe one day the CRJ will be as good as the Carenado aircraft.
to foolish words deaf ears
to foolish words deaf ears
Yes… to foolish words…
Obviously things like systems and flight dynamics aren’t important then…
But what one person’s gold, is another person’s trash seems to apply here.
From what I see in this forum there are people who seem not to understand the complaints and respect the opinions of others. I am only talking about the exterior modeling, the flight model I have no complaints about it, I feel cheated, that you and the people Does it matter to him and does he have over 50 euros? Sounds cool to me, but to most normal people, this kind of prob
Anyway, anyone who has the CRj 500/700 check it for himself, activate the camera drone, and bring it almost as close to the exterior details of the plane and the livery, serrated teeth appear by the flag, the tail, etc. the same with any default plane, you will see
Its a reality
Lol That would be your GPU not the CRJ. I don’t see this…! If the livery you are using is less then 10mb in size zipped then it is not quality. If you d/l a livery which is 70 mb then you will not suffer anti aliasing problems. It’s the livery maker not the plane maker.
I’m just saying that I thought you’re trying to point out the flaws so that the Aerosoft developer could take a look at the feedback and plan to make an update to it. From what I’m seeing is that, even if the community here has visibility with the issues you’re facing.
Whether we buy it or not, it won’t have any impact on the future development or update of the mod to fix the issues, simply because they don’t know if it’s an issue since you didn’t post it in their forum.
But if you post it in their forum, and they receive the feedback and plan to get the aircraft updated or not. If we do buy it, we would get the fix update. But if we don’t buy it, then we wouldn’t benefit from it.
So my point is, posting it in here doesn’t really give a benefit (as a whole) other than giving other people idea to avoid the mod. But that’s not solving the issue because they don’t know it’s an issue, solving the issue is to point out to the developer directly with the issues, so that they can fix it, and people who do buy it receive the fix.
Jajajajajajajajajajaja
Jajajajajajajaja
Jajajajajajajajajaja
Rtx 3080 its a bad gpu yes friend
First of all I wanted to thank you for your recommendation, and if I have already made it known to the developer, secondly I wanted to tell you that this is a free forum to comment and comment on things with which I think and comment where I can, I am only giving my opinion and avoiding Many people who look at everything in detail spend 50 euros and feel disappointed with the exterior 3D model by expanding the details to the maximum, thank you for your contribution and if I hope this is solved for me and for everyone
Nope, I don’t feel the same. I only play at 1440p and it looks great but I pay money for systems and flight quality. As long as the aircraft is presentable as far as textures go then I’m fine. The aircraft looks fantastic inside and our in my opinion.
Liveries I care about almost not at all because I rarely look at the exterior. It is the flying I’m interested in.
So yeah, some people don’t like it for a range of reasons and that is fair enough. Some of us want different things. But as far as what they advertised and have been showing over the last 6 months it ticks all the boxes I thought it would tick.
I certainly can’t see any reason for surprises. Well, except maybe a couple of the non-pilot error bugs but I know Aerosoft and Asobo will fix their respective issues so I’ll just have to be patient. It is plenty flyable now.
Fair enough…but most Flight Simmers are more interested in the systems and dynamics of the product than how pretty it is…well I am anyway.
For example, Carenado have always produced a “pretty” product, but their systems and dynamics are only of a fair to good quality…sure, now and then, a developer will produce a product where looks and systems are of both excellent quality…eg PMDG and Majestic to name a few…but as a long time simmer and real world pilot…I’ll take systems over looks any day of the week.
But, you are in a different category of requirement…so why don’t you shoot an email to Aerosoft with your observations.?..who knows they may act on it
Your opinion seems respectable to me, I don’t have anything bad to say about systems or flight, because in that the plane seems brilliant to me, but try to activate the camera drone and bring the exterior details of the plane as close as possible, look at the lines in the queue the flags, logos and in general the livery, I repeat activating the camera drone and bringing the plane as close as possible, I think it’s great that you are satisfied with the CRJ, but when I spend the money and more than 50 euros, it is only two planes ONLY two when for a little more do you have 20 default planes? Airplanes that are aesthetically impeccable, expanding the details to the maximum, when I spend my money I expect something logical and that is that at least they have the same graphic quality as the default airplanes, it is something simple and easy to understand, I am not buying xplane or flight airplanes simulator X, I am buying aircraft for fs2020 and I expect a minimum of quality in systems and modeling, and as I already told you in systems and piloting it is a 10, but in modeling it leaves a lot to be desired and that is a reality
Well said and i agree 100%
Your observations would carry a lot more weight with some screen shots.
It may well be that the poor images you are seeing, are dues to some unique non-optimum setting you may have, or to poor addon liveries ??