I’ll just add an FAA link rather than write a book! 
https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/aim_html/chap1_section_2.html#:~:text=While%20both%20RNAV%20navigation%20specifications,operation%20within%20a%20defined%20airspace.
Regards
Sorry, I’m not sure that explains what “RNAV RNP minima” is? In fact, I doubt that that is even a thing. Do you perhaps mean approaches whose minima are defined in terms of RNP accuracy (RNP 0.3, RNP 0.2, RNP 0.1), for example in the RNP Z 05 (AR) approach into LPMA?
1 Like
Yes, that is correct. Approaches which only have RNP minima and not LPV, LNAV/VNAV, or LNAV minima are not flyable by the TBM, as the TBM is not certified for any RNP approaches (in the traditional sense, I know the terminology is changing such that what used to just be called RNAV are now migrating to being called RNP, but with traditional RNAV minima).
3 Likes
Thank you! (Also pls migrate yourself faster; the deadline was last December and I only understand the new terminology.)
The terminology has not been updated in all parts of the world simultaneously. There are parts (such as North America) which are still working through parts of the transition and most approaches are still named RNAV.
3 Likes
TBM 930
Why is the FL crossed out? I thought it means that the requirement could not be fulfilled. The only value that is not crossed out when entered manually is FL46, i.e. the same as SB050
Are these manually inserted? Looking at GAGSI 1Y you need a climb gradient enough to reach PABLA at or above 6500/FL065. Maybe it can’t calculate a climb that matches both the 047 at SB051 and that?
The Garmin 300 Pilot’s Guide says: (Page 310) 190-01046-01 Rev A
An altitude constraint is invalid if meeting the constraint requires the aircraft to climb.
1 Like
Exactly, no climb VNAV on the TBM.
1 Like
Hello,
Today I noticed a potential rendering bug within the G3000/5000 weather radar system. Flying the Longitude through poor weather.
The weather radar starts as one would expect but after the first ‘sweep’ the resolution is scattered and ‘blurred’ almost.
See below for the picture & video:
In this video, you can see when I change the range it resets momentarily to how it should look with individual ‘globs’ and after the radar beam sweeps across it becomes blurred and lower resolution.
This issue makes it nearly impossible to accurately detect and avoid pockets of bad weather.
Sim version: 1.32.7.0 Platform: PC
EDIT: Issue has been found. Weather radar ‘breaks’ if another split has some weather display on it (i.e. CONNEX). Spoke with WT devs and they are aware of the issue.
3 Likes
Same issue on my System. Do you have PMS GTN750? Deactivate NEXRAD on the GTN750 and it should work in the G3000/G5000.
1 Like
quick q: in the G3000 what does CAS 0 (up) 0 (down) mean?
It’ll only display so many CAS messages at a time, which may mean you need to scroll to more. In your case, there are no more CAS messages to scroll to. What’s the CAS message above that?
1 Like
gotcha. it was something to do with fuel transfer
1 Like
noticed I was unable to show wind vector on the MFD map. I thought this was a feature, anyone else able to do this?
just checked, mine is unavailable as well. Probably not included yet, maybe with the upcoming release from FlightFX.
That screenshot isn’t from a Vision Jet, it’s from a TBM. There’s a Bleed Air toggle visible in the left side.
1 Like
Yep. I jumped in the TBM last night quickly and confirmed this is unavailable on the MFD - on ground and in flight. PFD wind showed between 3 and 11 knots throughout the flight.
ok thanks for confirming. maybe it’s plane-dependent as I have had it working in another model
2 Likes
I was in the default TBM, standard livery, no mods that I can think of. Could be another unrelated mod throwing errant shade this way.
Long story short - it should be available on a G3000-equipped TBM.
1 Like