I want the 310 but it’s not turbocharged and the FSW 414, not sure about $49.95- it would have to be superb for that price.
We’ll have to see what price the 310 comes in at.
That’s a bold strategy, Cotton. Really gives people a sense of pride and accomplishment in their ownership.
1 Like
Yeah, the Seneca from Carenado was pretty decent. I would say the 30 that it’s now is a fair price. To be fair, they have updated it several times and its engine out and stalls are not half bad. Get it?
No but carenado stepped up their game from their usual Visual-Focused methods.
These planes from Milviz and FlySimWorks look pretty good but the systems and depth is the reason why they would cost more. It has taken a lot more work to model and code all this complex stuff into a slightly stable simulator.
The 414 is $50 but it’s modeled pretty well, looks like it has a lot of depth and function.
The Milviz 310 I have soft spot for and its smaller.
They both support the various garmin 750 units. This is a must for some of us. I don’t use the G1000 in the simulators anymore. Dials and knobs annoy me.
Since I have the Seneca V already and its fairly decent for what it is…I will likely not need another twin.
Unless I see some comparisons between the two in video reviews. Then we will see.
Until then, I am letting the competition happen.
1 Like
The 414 is now listed with an introductory price of $39.99.
4 Likes
Ok. That might also change my mind.
1 Like
Hoping this comes out very soon so I can decide between it or the FlySimAware 414
1 Like
Amongst the thing that will make me chose the C310 is the random failures. It is very rare to see that feature in a sim plane!
3 Likes
The cumulative wear and tear on this is a huge deal and I believe it is the first plane in MSFS to do so. That’s A2A levels of detail
13 Likes
I agree. It looks like it’s A2A fidelity. Let’s see how it turns out once it’s in the market but for me it looks great and since A2A has been very quite I hope this will fuel the competition a bit 
1 Like
Well I got the 414 regardless and it is amazing.
Still want the 310 as who doesn’t love a smaller twin?
4 Likes
I’ll probably get both. Haven’t gotten the 414 yet. However strongly more leaning on this one.
Definitely prefer the C310. Looks better and I don’t fly high anyway so no need for Turbo or a pressurised cabin
2 Likes
90% sure I will just get the C310 as well.
1 Like
I don’t care what it cost, please release it and take my money.
2 Likes
Is Milviz going to enable the MSFS 2020 custom registration number feature on the C310?
It’s a tool that everybody in the sim knows how to use. You don’t use it when a livery has a fixed registration number on the livery art, and you use it to add a registration number to liveries without one. It allows us to register a generic livery in the country/region we are flying in. 3rd Party livery artists can then offer generic liveries that players can register anywhere in the world!
It would be great feature on the Milviz C310.
3 Likes
Can we have an ETA for an ETA… ,
…Just joking, sorry.
2 Likes
Yeah. He’s a bit demanding but, he’s also right. There are others who have asked this.
I spent a couple of hours and, with the help of one of the devs, got it working.
It’s in.
9 Likes
Personally, I prefer to assign my own registration number. I change it in the .cfg file. However, I’m also indifferent to it because there’s rarely any liveries I like. Most people seem to like having a copy of a specific real aircraft, which is the opposite of what I want. I want my own aircraft.
As I said though, I’m indifferent either way for the most part.
4 Likes
We did this for one, specific livery only. It’s the new company paint job.
3 Likes
Good for him and those who have been asking. I am happy you were willing and able to accommodate them. I suppose, if you press hard enough, SOMETIMES things do happen!