Not sure what means high end, each years, new stuff coming, that same high end this years next year will be mid and so on, every system shift down for the same price on CPU\GPU. This is not fixed xbox platform. Next new GPU card are coming fast.
1 Like
High manual LODs are going to give you some stuttering. This was mentioned as a known issue for the next hotfix that they plan to address in WU6. I really wouldnāt worry about visuals until the next hotfix has dropped as they are addressing some of the now known issues regarding them.
Wish we knew if it were 25 hours away or not.
My rig is considered High end.
Motherboard: Asus Rog Hero x11 wifi Z490
55" curved oled Tv.
CPU: Intel i9-10900K @5.3mhz per core.
GPU: Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3090 turbo
CPU-Cooler: Liquid cooled 240mm
PSU: Kolink 1200watt Platinum
RAM: Corsair Vengeance 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4/3600mhz
M.2 NVME SSD: 1TB Samsung 970 EVO Plus
M.2 NVME SSD: 1TB Samsung 970 EVO Plus
SSD: NVME Samsung 970 EVO 500GB
5.1 logitech sound system Soundblaster Z.
Next level V3 Motion platform on GT Ultimate rig.
2 Buttkickers on race rig with 300watt earthquake amp.
Sim Racing studio wind and tactile generators.
Saitek Quadrant.
Saitek Multi panel.
Honeycomb Alpha Yoke.
Honeycomb Bravo Throttle controller.
Saitek fuel controller and deicer levers.
Thrustmaster TPR Rudder.
VR. HP Reverb G2
1 Like
a note: if I see these specs, I have others in mind as to call it a āhigh end rigā 
It is such a big mistake to believe that a better and more powerful computer will make things better.
Nobody seems to understand the game is really new, full of bugs and non optimized. There are so many problems they will fix and will make the game run smoother, without the necessity of having a super-powerful computer.
Right now we just have to be patient and wait for improvements, they are the ones that need to fix the game. At the end of the day, we are paying big money to overcome all the gameās problems.
I have a 970, a 3600 and 16 of RAM, with the latest update I am getting 45 FPS over New York, and it looks awesome. I didnāt pay any extra money for a 3090, I just waited.
But anyways, who am I to say ādonāt spend your money in what you wantā?, nobody.
The Husky, which they released on the marketplace yesterday. Very fun little plane.
1 Like
Thank you for the feedback! Iāll make sure this somehow gets documented somewhere!
Yes. pretty much this. And you probably do not try to get 4k @ ultra out of your system. Before I upgraded I had a GTX980 and a 4770k, it was chugging along happily at 1080p and with a mix of high/medium settings. It is just the expectation that needs to be curtailed a bit when not running top of the line hardware.
2 Likes
No thatās bleeding edge, far and above āhigh endā.
Weird flex, but ok 
Iām sure Iāve read quite a few posts that state that disabling virtualisation in the BIOS is a good thing to do.
1 Like
yes.. I tried both, because there was older discussions where users reported that performance will increased in case of disabling it. As expected there was no diff in enabled or disabled :).. Iāam back to the normal āonā setting ( also because my VM software need it ).
Problem is back no solution at all. Sever pings goes from 150-350ms. Think thatās it. The scenery does not load proper fast enough. First impression shows 52ms but seconds later the pings went crazy on all severs to choose. 150-350ms.
no issue here ( 28ms )ā¦ but if I see the āLatenzā in your first screenshot of 40ms, I would guess your connection is in generally not the best. Any other noticable issues with the connection ? WiFi or LAN ?
Because of the post with the CPU virtualisation by @orthi , I have now āwastedā a few hours of time. The Glass Cockpit Refresh Rate is set to High for me. However, I have also tested with the medium setting. No matter whether I activate SVM (AMD-VT) in my BIOS or not, the measured CPU and GPU performance is always the same. It makes no difference. Since I donāt use virtualisation software like VirtualBox, VMware or Parallels Desktop, I deactivated it again. At least I know now that I can ignore such tips.
@orthi , have you ever checked your assertion intensively? 
exactly what I mentioned ā¦ but it is also not wrong to disable it, in case you not need VMās
Yes, great, you write your post 2 hours ago. I was testing at the time. If I had read it before, I could have saved myself the testing. But I only read it now. What could I have done during that time? I can think of a few things (looking at my wife 
). Yes, I donāt use VMs. Thatās why it can be off.
1 Like
there are old vodoo post (s ?) in forum which show diagramms with more than 50% better fps in case āoffā versus āonā. Therefore I have the virtualisation stuff so in my mindā¦ So far I know, a small amount of memory is reserved in case it is on, but I never noticed such an amount of fps āwinā or ālossā ( like from 10fps to >30fps in this case here) as allways reported. If that would be the case, these ātechnicā would be more or less already died.
For me, the CPU load was about 1 % higher with VT switched on and the GPU load was identical. However, this was probably more of a measurement tolerance.