Even if it’s a nice product, the WT GNS530 is still in beta and has some issues that will be fixed soon.
On our side, we recommend uninstalling it for now, even if our GTN750 and the WT GNS530 are compatible.
We currently have a modified GNS530 code (made by us) that fixes the issue of the GTN750 buttons not being responsive but we’ll not deliver a GNS530 patch on our side, waiting for a solution from WT/Asobo.
Thank you to uninstall the WT GNS530 if you have this issue and want to use our GTN750.
2 Likes
Hello,
I’ve upgraded to last main package but have strange bug, only now discovered with Vatsim flight and needed log off and install 2.1.44 version. My problem with that last version, DA62 with integrated version G1000. I filled FPL without problems but after PROC I started to add Enroute waypoints, nothing. GTN can find waypoints correctly but doesn’t include them in FPL. Back to 44 version, all ok, hope, I’ll see after t/o 
Update: FPL and SID are working just fine, also selection of DCT from FPL now without problems.
NEW GTN 750 RELEASE V2.1.53
- Bugfix: Flight plan issues when it comes from the world map and contains more than a user waypoint. Occurs only with the stock sim flight planner.
- Bugfix in WTT mode (V1): Starting from SU11 the enroute waypoints were not loaded from the world map flight plan.
2 Likes
Hello,
can I ask kindly if your 53 version also solve my report? Sry, did test now and same. Is also f.ex. DA62 MSFS new package required? My steps:
- Set FPL - start/destination → OK (LZIB-LKMT)
- add SID via PROC → OK (BERVA1A rwy31)
- now want add Enroute Waypoints from FPL screen, add MAVOR (find ok) but after ENTER nothing added.
I fill FPL inside airplane, no with World map.
Thank you for outstanding support, no problem this time, I can fly with 44 version without problems. Very appreciate your work and GTN750 functionality. Great product!
Thank you to use our support on discord. We can’t provide support from here.
1 Like
Hello,
very sry then, I don’t want use Discord now because I had very bad experience before with tons of spams in my email. Really, it’s not clear to me why I need use another web site if I can easy report all here. Very sry, why all of this social media are bothering and need them use? I see really very good place here for all of problematic of this nice addon. What then I need to do???
Developers providing support on these forums is against forum rules. That’s just the way it is.
2 Likes
That’s interesting,
because I see many other devs providing support here on Forum, really I don’t care if they are from MS or have some contracts with them.
Are you sure it is support from the actual developer and not from fans and/or beta testers that are not directly affiliated with the developers?
I have seen some of my favorite developer threads get reprimanded for providing support. That is why everyone points to Discord. How long ago was it you had issues with Discord? I don’t get any spam, I’m subscribed to a bunch of discords, it’s a very useful tool to learn about development, updates, bugs, etc.
Yes,
as you said as many today peoples - I’m subscribed to a bunch of Discords… Very sry, I don’t want to talk and talk with someone else and do researches all days, I’m not that one spending all day on buls**** social medias. Stop do any preasure to give me some nice good vision of Discord and any other kind of sites (created due politics and other depended things), not my side.
I am personally sorry for your experience but cannot help you.
1 Like
Hello,
no problem, thnx for that. On other side G1000 NXi is working now ok, if I good see, from my last bug report so I use it now again. With my Seneca I’ll try use again that new 530/430 system or will still use previous one. GTN750 I must leave now, shame…
I forget to say, I’ve discovered another bug inside GTN750 so shame to not have some other kind of feedback, shame for other pilots also.
Most of us are happy to use their Discord and have direct communications with the wonderful and responsive developer there. As has been mentioned that is not allowed here.
So, yes, I guess it is a shame that you are not willing to do that.
However, if you want to document your bug with full steps to reproduce it, I am sure someone here will be happy to report it to the developer via their Discord.
Hi,
yes, no problem to document what’s matter. It’s old bug but I needed check if it’s also with new SU11 presented or not and it is. Ok to problem:
- you can start your flight, fill FPL inside, do any procedures and land. We can say till now, all is ok.
- you want to do next flight after some minutes passed, no go to Main menu (World map), continue on Aprone, so my procedure was delete actual FPL (via menu option) and set new one. Looks like no problem here, all is set ok.
- do SID departure as normal but here it is, the first leg of departure is ok but after that the (second or third???) isn’t executed. Track isn’t colored also with Magenta as actual/active and aircraft only follow heading presented. You need now do intervention manually to activate this leg via DCT f.ex. or via FPL.
This can be reproduced again and again without problems.
Hello,
just Update with same situation. Again, return flight but now with new WT GNS530 device. Same situation (GTN750 packages completelly out of Community for test), 2-nd SID leg isn’t activated, I need do manual dct. Now is question if this is WT core problem because GTN750 use also WT technology (my situation with Seneca) or sim. I’ll do test after this flight again with stock GNS without any WT also.
Hello,
so with GNS stock all is working correctly, no missing leg after start of second flight within SID. This looks like definitely some WT core problem. I did today some hard work 3 same flights IFR with little bit distance but inside lovely Slovakia-Czech Airspace.
Discord does not spam anything, not even a single email, unless you agree or put your email elsewhere 
It is against the forum’s rules here for them to provide support.
One of the biggest Issue I see with the WT GNS530, is its inability to have its own Internal list of saved Flight Plans, and I understand from the WT Discord, that such a feature is not planned. 
1 Like
Yeah, that’s a shame for sure. However I think this works: open the toolbar version of the PMS GTN750, import the flight plan file (I save mine from Little NavMap), then minimise/close again. I think that syncs the route info to the WT GNS530, as far as I can tell.
I think so as well …
But here is a strange one.
KDCA - KDCA, IFR Low altituide, RNav 01 approach
You can create this Approach in World Map, and the WT GNS530 will do that approach
but, IF you try to create that FP “IN” the WT GNS530, it will not allow (Show) the Rnal 01 as an approach option.
I am told because the WT GNS530 cannot do the Rnav01 (with GS) , so it knows that, and hence does not allow it to be displayed as an option,
But isn’t the WT GNS530 a GNS530W, and this able to do this GS RNAV approach ?
The PMS GNS530 certainly can (very well)