Still missing Nav data at KASE - Aspen

I am still unable to find Navigation data in the A320 MCDU when trying to find the available approaches at KASE. No LOC 15 or RNAV approaches are displayed. Anyone having the same issue?

Thanks

1 Like

Same issue, I have to manually plot the VOR/DME 15 IAP.

1 Like

Would love to know as to why IAPs are not available for Runway 15 @ Aspen/Pitkin, CO (KASE)? There are three current IAPs for RNWY 15; RNAV (GPS)-F, LOC/DME-E (looking for the most), and ROARING FORK VISUAL, however FS2020 doesn’t seem to know about them. Anything I can do? Thank you for any help, much appreciated.

-Christian

Are there any circling approaches in the database? Those are all circling approaches, technically. (Except for the visual, which will never make it in)

Hopefully they can add them, given the popularity and added challenge of circling approaches (especially the LOC/DME-E into Aspen). Wonder if Navigraph will help with this?

All approaches are still missing from KASE in the A320, can these be added?

1 Like

Microsoft Store version

Are you using Developer Mode or made changes in it?
No

Brief description of the issue: Been flying into Aspen with the LOC-DME-E Approach. Tuning in IASE 111.15 Nav in Loc1 mode and Approach mode - but the Aerosoft CRJ 700 does not capture GS. It should capture at 11700ft, and I have tried several times.

Detail steps to reproduce the issue encountered: Fly CRJ 700 from Aerosoft to KASE Aspen and try landing the famous LOC-DME-E rwy 15 approach.

Build Version # when you first started experiencing this issue: I have experiencing this issue 28.01.22 and some days earlier when I have tried landing in Aspen.

This is a LOC-DME approach. There is no glideslope.

2 Likes

MikeB54331 is correct, and you spelled it out yourself.
Loc(localizer) DME using a DME not an ILS with a glideslope.
RNav would probably be the preferred approavh. make sure you follow all the altitude constarints in the FMC!

I flew the Loc DME in Innsbruck with a glideslope. It’s not the same?

Localizer approaches, by definition, do not provide any electronic vertical guidance. If you are getting vertical guidance in the sim for an approach into LOWI it’s an error in the sim. I have flown the approaches in the sim to KASE but not into LOWI. I’ll have to give it a try when I have an opportunity.

At Innsbruck, Rwy 08 is a DME LOC approach.
A LOC DME does not have a glideslope.
You may inadvertently done an RNAV approach if you did Rwy 08.
Rwy 26 is an offset ILS approach, meaning the localizer does not come in straight to the runway, but on a slight angle

It was rwy 26. I see the difference now.Thanks.

1 Like

This is an old report, both approaches are available on the World map so I assume missing navigation data has been added since then. I am not a A320 specialist, but since OP reported it for that aircraft, could the OP or someone confirm issue has been resolved ?