The 1935 Douglas DC-3

Looked all over that link but could not find the document you referenced. Can you help me find it please?
Thanks,
Garry

Here it is:

https://dc3airways.net/flights/training_div/files/xOperating_the_DC-3.zip

3 Likes

Sorry, I didnā€™t want to share the link file because I tried to avoid direct downloads without visiting their work. Iā€™ve took a screenshot where you can find the file:


I hope it helps

This is my attempt at getting free castering tail wheel working. Itā€™s not perfect and seems to only want to do sharp turns very slowly but much better than the default.

I think devs arenā€™t using this as they want their aircraft to be flyable without needing pedals but really Asobo should make castering wheels and option in assistance settings to let those of us with pedals make realistic use of them.

Copy this over relevent section in Flight Model.cfg. I modified the file in the duckworth enhancement mod

[CONTACT_POINTS]
static_pitch = 11.5
static_cg_height = 9.5
gear_system_type = 1	;0 = electrical, 1 = hydraulic, 2 = pneumatic, 3 = manual, 4 = none, 5 = undefined
tailwheel_lock = 1
locked_tailwheel_max_range = 0.261799
max_castering_angle = 3.14159265358979




gear_locked_on_ground = 0
gear_locked_above_speed = 250
max_speed_full_steering = 0
max_speed_decreasing_steering = 0
min_available_steering_angle_pct = 0.0
max_speed_full_steering_castering = 40
max_speed_decreasing_steering_castering = 40
min_available_steering_angle_pct = 0.0
min_castering_angle = 0.0


max_number_of_points = 15

;landing gear
point.0 = 1, -55.53, 0, -2.89, 1600, 0, 0.6, 180, 0.082, 2.5, 0.695, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2			; sta 666.4
point.1 = 1, -18.33, -9.761698, -11.25, 1600, 1, 1.875, 0, 0.704, 2.5, 0.682, 4.7, 11.5, 2, 140, 150, 2	; sta 220
point.2 = 1, -18.33, 9.761698, -11.25, 1500, 2, 1.875, 0, 0.704, 2.5, 0.682, 5.2, 11.5, 3, 140, 150, 2	; sta 220

;main gear retracted
;point.3 = 1, -18.33, -9.761698, -8.25, 1600, 1, 1.875, 0, 0.704, 2.5, 0.682, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 2	; sta 220
;point.4 = 1, -18.33, 9.761698, -8.25, 1500, 2, 1.875, 0, 0.704, 2.5, 0.682, 0, 0, 3, 0, 0, 2	; sta 220

;scrape points
point.3 = 2, 0, 0, 0, 800, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 4, 0, 0, 1			; nose
point.4= 2, -9, 9.25, -6.757123, 800, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 8, 0, 0, 1	; right engine nacelle scrape
point.5 = 2, -9, -9.25, -6.757123, 800, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1	; left engine nacelle scrape
point.6 = 2, -60, -0.0, -1.637793, 800, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 4, 0, 0, 1	; tail scrape
point.7 = 2, -57, -0.0, 12, 800, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 4, 0, 0, 1		; top of fin
point.8 = 2, -60, -13.25, 1.5, 800, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 4, 0, 0, 1		; left stab tip
point.9 = 2, -60, 13.25, 1.5, 800, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 4, 0, 0, 1		; right stab tip
point.10 = 2, -26, -47, 1, 800, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 4, 0, 0, 1		; left wing tip
point.11 = 2, -26, 47, 1, 800, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 4, 0, 0, 1		; right wing tip
point.12 = 2, -8, 0, 4.3, 800, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 4, 0, 0, 1		; fuselage top
point.13 = 2,-20.33,-9.762,-6.25,1600,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0	; left waterscrape
point.14 = 2,-20.33,9.762,-6.25,1500,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0	; right waterscrape


emergency_extension_type	= 1
steering_time_constants		= 3, 5
hyd_need_power_to_function	= 0
3 Likes

Iā€™ve made a topic to try and get Asobo to make this an option so aircraft devs make use of the castering options, please contribute here if you feel this is needed: Make Castering nose / tail Wheels an option in Assistance Settings

2 Likes

Voted
Thanks for the topic.

So what about the current Duckworks castering wheel mod, it already works?

1 Like

Devs arenā€™t doing this because it produces very strange results on most tailwheel aircraft, especially those that have no tailwheel lock available. Try using the same parameters on a light aircraft and then see if you would still suggest it be made available in assistance settings. For the DC-3, itā€™s not too bad, but still quite strange. Also refer to this post above:

This is an issue that needs to be formally implemented into the sim and it hasnā€™t been after over two years. Itā€™s very annoying.

1 Like

Thanksā€¦I went right past that and did not see it. Got it now.

Garry

1 Like

Thanks. I went right past that and did not see it. Got it now.

Garry

1 Like

A question for the veterans. Reading the document ā€œOperating the DC3ā€ from DC3Airways Iā€™ve found this about gear latch lever:

A safety latch, operated by a lever on the floor, locks the gear in place when the
gear is extended. This lever is at the right of the pilotā€™s seat. When pressure indicates that your gear is in full DOWN position, return valve handle to neutral and lock gear by pushing the lever forward parallel to the floor and securing it in the handle catch. Disengage safety
latch by moving latch lever to vertical position.

The latch lever has a spring-latch position at an angle of 50 degrees to the floor. The latch automatically assumes this position when the gear is raised and the valve handle in neutral. The latch lever remains in the 50 degrees position until you have lowered the gear and are ready to lock it by moving the latch to DOWN.

The lever in the sim serves a different function. Is this a mistake or maybe is a feature from a different version of the DC3?

Hello friends, I just saw a detail from inside the cabin that the ā€œbladesā€ of the Motor ventilation are not animated (open and close), if you look from inside the cabin and look at the motor and click on close and openā€¦ There is no animation suddenly it appears open and closedā€¦ Hummmā€¦ itā€™s the small details that make the differenceā€¦ Iā€™m actually still using the A310ā€¦ I love the DC3 but Iā€™m still spending time on the A310ā€¦ When using the DC3, the first thing I would like to do is look at the operations manualā€¦ But the little that I have seen and tested, there are things that can be improved, it could be polished a little more, mainly the lighting at night, the Instruments in red colorā€¦ They are very irrealā€¦ They have too intense red color, it doesnā€™t look like anything real from a light bulb, especially if we think of an old one, for example, the lighting of the A310 is very successful. I hope there will be some important update for the DC3, I would like to spend months flying this plane, but at the moment I am not very convinced. Itā€™s more of a filler than a reference, such as the A310 and the HondaJet (very pleasant planes to use for weeks, months) ā€¦ Iā€™m glad to see the DC3 but I hope they improve it.
It is a very complicated job but I hope they do not discourage and manage to achieve it

1 Like

How about the code that lets the smaller ones unlock there tail through pushing the stick forward?

1 Like

What about them?

Could that type of system work with the Dak

Why would you want to? You have a tail locking switch for that very reason.

Elsewhere in this thread, AH said that MS owns the plane now including responsibility to update it. I believe this is true for all the planes released with 40th anniversary edition. It has nothing to do with ā€œentitlementā€ on AHā€™s part for any reason, itā€™s contractual.

Edit: Guess I was wrong on this, maybe thatā€™s a different vendorā€™s contractā€¦
Hopefully they follow through on their support thenā€¦

1 Like

From this post:

It instead sounds like AH is providing continued support and development on the DC-3, not Asobo. Theyā€™re contractually obligated to do so because Microsoft paid them a lot of money. Maybe they got a lot more money than if they tried to sell this on their own even. Who knows?

Donā€™t get me wrong. I think the DC-3 is good. Itā€™s not great compared to some of the other aircraft created by Asobo and others. But Iā€™ll use it and have fun with it.

But it irks me a bit when AH refers to this as a ā€œtotally free giftā€. Because a lot of us have been buying all the expansion packs and using the Marketplace in order to support continued development of the simulator platform. Iā€™m ok with Microsoft outsourcing stuff like this, but a chunk of our add-on purchases are going to AH now for good or bad. Personally, Iā€™d rather they paid for some extra developer hours to fix ongoing issues in the sim, rather than buying third party aircraft for us. But we donā€™t really have a say in that, and thatā€™s fine.

I say its entitlement because when theyā€™re under the impression that this is a ā€œtotally free giftā€, they act as if this excuses them from criticism or customer requests. As if people are dissing the quality of a freeware add-on, but itā€™s not really freeware if our money was channeled to them to make this add-on. Maybe they donā€™t have to treat us like we all bought a $69.99 add-on directly from them, but they should probably be grateful that userbase as a whole bought their product.

5 Likes

You mean like on the mustang? The AH P-51 has it coded to the stick but it isnā€™t done properly - again because there has been no way to simulate a free castering tail wheel in the sim. It is supposed to lock with the stick pulled back and allowing 6 degrees steerable each way, and stick forward to unlock to free castering. Currently, locked is just locked straight forward and unlocked is steerable with rudder pedals 90 degrees each way. Neither are right.

The T6ā€™s from the reno pack do have this modelled correctly though. Locked when stick back and fully free when forwards. The amount of play when locked can be set in the config file

1 Like