I’ve noticed a big perfomance hit in UK photogrammetry cities. It also mostly looks like this: [20210219180110_1] Other countries seem fine, japan for comparison: [20210219192220_1] Anyone else having the same issue?

Hello, since version 1.13.16.0 I have a lot of errors on water surfaces? it disappears when you approach the scene [image] [image]

Try deleting the rolling cache first, maybe there is still old data in there. It looks like water polygon issues. it’s a widespread problem and persistent without cache. The London update sunk London a bit creating an interesting transition with the rest of the data. [Thames Waterfall 2] Perhaps…

that’s because the web site isn’t very optimized [Microsoft FSX using Google Earth 3D Scenery Tampa Tour]

I have a 100Mbs connection which was peaking at 99Mbs just now and mostly sitting at 97Mbs over the London Eye. It wasn’t really keeping up with rendering while in a Cessna 172S at low altitude, no rolling cache. Flying at two thousand ft it seems fine though and was using about 75Mbs. I was gettin…

Oh thank you for the answer! I emptied the cache, I still have a lot of level error [image] It’s in the north of France, where everything is flat! LoL !

PG quality is almost always only mediocre in many cities, either with default BingMaps coverage or World Update coverage as in Tokyo and London. My problem with it is actually the coverage, which is with the World Update very limited extending across downtown Tokyo and London only, considering the …

I mentioned it in other post but I distinctly remember the whole streaming graphics on the fly for gaming has been tried and abandoned in the past. If memory serves it may have been as far back as the late 90s. The internet has come a long way since then but judging by this thread perhaps not far…

Well there are PG cities / areas outside of the UK which do work fine so it is not impossible I assume?

It’s all relative, I’ve been stress testing the game to find the extremes. Just now I did a flight from Southend to Heathrow at 2,000 ft altitude. Much more reasonable height. 185 knots TAS, the sim had no trouble keeping up, network usage stayed just under 50 mbps over London. [London 2000ft] I’…

[image] SvenZ: At 500 ft altitude, it pretty much looks the same with terrain at 100 or 200, the only difference, 1.65 GiB extra data you can’t see from that height. At 2,000 ft terrain 200 is still on the short side, the horizon looks rather bare. There is another issue affecting terrain LOD…

UK update - photogrammetry performance / quality

Discussion Hub General Discussion

CptLucky8 February 25, 2021, 3:20pm 38

There is another issue affecting terrain LOD and this might also be a factor with PG areas if the expected and the computer LOD are different:

LOD Problems - Distances revisited