I agree.
Ideally threads like this help to establish the view that there is an imbalance in the development process of MSFS, which gives preference to aircraft systems, scenery and features while neglecting the area where flying actually takes place.
Consequently this would lead to an intensified demand for the best possible simulation for Atmosphere, Weather and Environment.
MS/Asobo will very well know (Bug/Wishlist section) what to make of that considering technical and economical limits.
I’m afraid that won’t work with repetitive discussions of technical details that are mostly hypothetical anyway.