that is the question
1 Like
i don’t know 
didn’t start flight yet, just disable msfs kavx kbid and don’t sure about 29 bridges addon
i think this topic can be recreated with more native english guy or girl owner and pined for future, there people can open knowledge about addons conflicts with default scenery. think time become lol
edited p.s. all bridges, that i saw right now looks good, 29 bridges stay in community. newark bridge stay photogram:(
cooooooool, but then will wu11 and wu12 and wu13 and… so may be stay with new update instead WU10?
I’ve briefly checked out DD’s Washington Landmarks and LVFR’s KSAN and have seen no real adverse effects (although I didn’t completely scan every square inch for overlapping landmarks like the Smithsonian buildings on the Mall and the National Cathedral - those need closer inspection by low fliers).
En route currently to KSEA to scan the skyline on the way down (DD’s Seattle Landmarks).
I will say this, KDFW is much improved, and KSFO also appears to be. Flew KDFW-KMSY and the ground below looked better to me. Not sure if it was a placebo effect or real, but I think the environment is improved.
4 Likes
thanx. looks like addons has enough exclude for stay in future ok long time.
p.s. btw. just found newark bridges one year as lying on flightsim.to
Thanks for checking. I was wondering about those as well. Glad to hear they are ok.
2 Likes
DD’s Seattle Landmarks look gorgeous - no issues I saw on approach.
4 Likes
They added PART of the new taxiway loops on the north end, but for WHATEVER REASON marked it as “closed”. Was hoping that area would be better.
What improvements have you noticed? I’m a semi-frequent flier out of there, but haven’t had time to look at much else.
1 Like
Looks to me like the building textures and ground textures are slightly improved. It just felt better looking around. They might have also smoothed out some of the giant slopes on the west side but I’m not certain - was on a different side of the airport today and it was sloped albeit not as dramatically.
The landscape textures seemed better after departure looking back (I’m wondering if DFW didn’t get some texture update also because the stadiums in Arlington were all present (before it was only AT&T).
1 Like
There seem to be an elevation conflict with the ORBX Alaska mesh and Valdez. Taxiways have ridges across them.
6 Likes
Valdez looks weird even without the ORBX mesh. Some weird pop-in during approach and if you are about 6000 ft above it, the runways have strange artifacts. The town also barely has any autogen.
3 Likes
How are Newyork and Chicago landmarks?
1 Like
Which New York addon? I assume you are referring to the DD Landmarks for Chicago?
1 Like
Yeah id like to know this too. Im grateful for the update but I have:
Seattle Landmarks
Washington Landmarks
New York
Bridgers Bridges
and more
Do I need to get rid of these now?
1 Like
samscene New York
I tried out DD’s Seattle Landmarks this morning with WU10ified Seattle, and it seems to work OK. I had a quick look across the skyline and didn’t notice any glaring errors like duplicate buildings or things like that.
I think the WU10-improvements for Seattle are mostly in the photogrammetry, it’s been cleaned up and just looks a lot nicer overall (most noticeable in the port of Seattle, check out the cranes there).
When you install DD’s Seattle Landmarks on top of that, it simply replaces photogrammetry buildings with their own handcrafted 3D buildings, essentially just like it was before WU10.
3 Likes
yep I didn’t notice any issues either. Cant find Disneyland and it has no marker.
2 Likes
google map?
Good to know thanks! I have DD’s Seattle Landmarks as well but I did disable it in anticipation of the Seattle area now being a wreck because of duplicates.
2 Likes
I think valdez is just at the border, where the scenery was improved with elevation data and new satellite images. If you look at the mountains opposite to Valdez, you see a clear and straight line, where the Autogen Trees suddenly are cutted off. Bit a weird thing to put a handdraftet airport directly at the border of improved vs very bad area.
4 Likes