Wrong default Fuselage_lateral_cx value + suggestion

Indeed the sketches can be misleading. The streamlined bodies are “rounded objects” like an oblong teardrop and half a teardrop. It’s not like a cross-section of a larger object. These are better:

Cd

2 Likes

So every developer who is using 0.4 or less is basically creating this with a propeller and wings:

3 Likes

That was me over there saying that. I double checked and it’s 0.8 so I was close. But it’s certainly not 4.3 :smiley:

4 Likes

Based on the information brought to light about cylinder drag, etc., it sounds like what you’ve been doing with fuselage_lateral_cx is about spot on. I changed a few configs last night and noticed definite improvements. No wonder I always had a sneaking suspicion planes felt a bit too slippy. I had played with the parameter a few months ago but the advice in the SDK guide discouraged me from venturing too far from 0.4. From now on, it’s going to be 0.8 as a baseline.

1 Like

At least in terms of lateral drag, yes. Destroying entire planets, that’s still in the works. Asobo would require the inverted nipple be removed if sold in the marketplace. No guns, remember?

1 Like

Yesterday I’ve copied this report including all of the suggestions into the SDK Q&A platform,
so far no response.

I think most of the developers are just using the very low default 0.4,
then they build/ adjust their airplane around it and at the end everybody is wondering why at certain points something is not matching with reality :sweat_smile:

3 Likes

I finally got around to building my table from the planes I currently have installed:

Plane Model fuselage_lateral_cx
antsairplanes-tiger-moth_1.1.0 antsairplanes-tiger-moth 0.7
atsimulations-aircraft-piaggio_2.15 ATSIMULATIONS_AIRCRAFT_PIAGGIO
bksq-aircraft-analogbaron bksq-aircraft-analogbaron
bksq-aircraft-analogbaron bksq-aircraft-analogbaronturbo
bksq-aircraft-analogbonanza bksq-aircraft-analogbonanza
bksq-aircraft-analogbonanza bksq-aircraft-analogbonanzatanks
bksq-aircraft-analogbonanza bksq-aircraft-analogbonanzaturbo
bksq-aircraft-analogcaravan_0.1.4 bksq-aircraft-analogcaravan 0.4
bksq-aircraft-analogcaravan_0.1.4a bksq-aircraft-analogcaravan 0.4
flysimware-cessna-414aw_3.4.4 flysimware_aircraft_414AW 0.2
flysimware-cessna-414aw_3.4.4 flysimware_cessna_414AW 0.2
gotgravel-savage-grravel_2.1.2 Asobo_Savage_Grravel 0.6
justflight-aircraft-pa28-arrow-iii_0.10.5 JF_PA28_Arrow 0.57
justflight-aircraft-pa28-turboarrow_0.5.5 JF_PA28_TurboArrow_III 0.57
justflight-aircraft-pa28-turboarrow_0.5.5 JF_PA28_TurboArrow_IV 0.57
justflight-aircraft-pa28-warrior-ii_0.3.5 JF_PA28_Warrior_II 0.4
orbx-aircraft-pac750 orbx-aircraft-pac750-agriculture 0.4
orbx-aircraft-pac750 orbx-aircraft-pac750-cargo 0.4
orbx-aircraft-pac750 orbx-aircraft-pac750-pax 0.4
orbx-aircraft-pac750 orbx-aircraft-pac750-skydive 0.4
pmdg-aircraft-dc6 PMDG DC-6A 0.36
pmdg-aircraft-dc6 PMDG DC-6B 0.36
sws-aircraft-kodiak-wheels__20221208 SWS_Kodiak_gear 0.4
sws-aircraft-kodiak-wheels__20221208 SWS_Kodiak_gear_CP 0.4
sws-aircraft-kodiak-wheels__20221208 SWS_Kodiak_tundra 0.4
sws-aircraft-kodiak-wheels__20221208 SWS_Kodiak_tundra_CP 0.4
wbsim-aircraft-c172sp-classic_1.0.6 wbsim_C172SP_Classic 0.8 ; 0.5
wbsim-aircraft-c172sp-classic_1.0.6 wbsim_C172SP_Classic_Floats 1.0 ; 0.8 ; 0.5
wbsim-aircraft-c172sp-classic_1.0.6 wbsim_C172SP_Classic_NoPants 0.8 ; 0.5
wbsim-aircraft-c172sp-classic_1.0.6 wbsim_C172SP_Classic_Skis 0.8 ; 0.5
asobo-aircraft-208b-grand-caravan-ex Asobo_208B_GRAND_CARAVAN_EX 0.4
asobo-aircraft-a320-neo Asobo_A320_NEO
asobo-aircraft-b7478i Asobo_B747_8i
asobo-aircraft-b787-10 Asobo_B787_10 0.4
asobo-aircraft-baron-g58 Asobo_Baron_G58
asobo-aircraft-bonanza-g36 Asobo_Bonanza_G36
asobo-aircraft-c152 Asobo_C152 0.4
asobo-aircraft-c152-aerobat Asobo_C152_Aerobat 0.4
asobo-aircraft-c172sp-as1000 Asobo_C172sp_AS1000 4.3
asobo-aircraft-c172sp-as1000 Asobo_C172sp_AS1000_Floaters
asobo-aircraft-c172sp-as1000 Asobo_C172sp_AS1000_Skis
asobo-aircraft-c172sp-as1000 Asobo_C172sp_AS1000_TowPlane 0.5
asobo-aircraft-c172sp-as1000bak Asobo_C172sp_AS1000
asobo-aircraft-c172sp-classic Asobo_C172sp_classic 0.4
asobo-aircraft-c172sp-classic Asobo_C172SP_Classic_Floats
asobo-aircraft-c172sp-classic Asobo_C172SP_Classic_Skis
asobo-aircraft-cabri-g2 Asobo_Cabri_G2
asobo-aircraft-cap10c Asobo_Cap10C
asobo-aircraft-cj4 Asobo_CJ4
asobo-aircraft-da40-ng Asobo_DA40_NG
asobo-aircraft-da40-tdi Asobo_DA40_TDI
asobo-aircraft-da62 Asobo_DA62
asobo-aircraft-dg1001-e Asobo_DG1001E_Neo 0.45
asobo-aircraft-dr400 Asobo_DR400
asobo-aircraft-dv20 Asobo_DV20
asobo-aircraft-e330 Asobo_E330
asobo-aircraft-fa18e Asobo_FA18E 0.4
asobo-aircraft-flightdesignct Asobo_FlightDesignCT
asobo-aircraft-generic-airliner-quadengines Asobo_Generic_Airliner_QuadEngines
asobo-aircraft-generic-airliner-twinengines Asobo_Generic_Airliner_TwinEngines
asobo-aircraft-generic-piston-multiengines Asobo_Generic_Piston_MultiEngines
asobo-aircraft-generic-piston-singleengine Asobo_Generic_Piston_SingleEngine
asobo-aircraft-generic-privatejet Asobo_Generic_PrivateJet
asobo-aircraft-generic-turbo-multiengines Asobo_Generic_Turbo_MultiEngines
asobo-aircraft-generic-turbo-singleengine Asobo_Generic_Turbo_SingleEngine
asobo-aircraft-icon Asobo_Icon
asobo-aircraft-kingair350 Asobo_KingAir350 0.4
asobo-aircraft-longitude Asobo_Longitude
asobo-aircraft-ls8 Asobo_LS8 0.45
asobo-aircraft-nxcub Asobo_NXCub 0.4
asobo-aircraft-pipistrel Asobo_Pipistrel 0.4
asobo-aircraft-pitts Asobo_Pitts
asobo-aircraft-savage-cub Asobo_Savage_Cub
asobo-aircraft-savage-shockultra Asobo_Savage_ShockUltra
asobo-aircraft-savage-shockultra Asobo_Savage_ShockUltra_Floats
asobo-aircraft-savage-shockultra Asobo_Savage_ShockUltra_Skis
asobo-aircraft-sr22 Asobo_SR22
asobo-aircraft-tbm930 Asobo_TBM930 0.4
asobo-aircraft-vl3 Asobo_VL3
asobo-aircraft-xcub Asobo_XCub 0.4
asobo-aircraft-xcub Asobo_XCub_Floats
asobo-aircraft-xcub Asobo_XCub_Skis
AssetGroups template-airplane-electric
AssetGroups template-airplane-glider
AssetGroups template-airplane-jet
AssetGroups template-airplane-piston
AssetGroups template-airplane-turboprop
AssetGroups template-helicopter-piston
microsoft-aircraft-bell407 microsoft-aircraft-bell407
microsoft-aircraft-dc3 douglas-dc3 0.8
microsoft-aircraft-dhc2 BlackbirdSims_DHC2_Floats 0.4
microsoft-aircraft-dhc2 BlackbirdSims_DHC2_Wheels 0.4
microsoft-aircraft-g-21 microsoft-aircraft-g-21 2.5
microsoft-aircraft-hughes-h4-hercules Microsoft_Hughes_H4_Hercules 0.4
microsoft-aircraft-jn4 microsoft-aircraft-jn4 3
microsoft-aircraft-pilatus-pc6 Microsoft_Pilatus_PC6_G950_Floats 0.4
microsoft-aircraft-pilatus-pc6 Microsoft_Pilatus_PC6_G950_Wheels 0.4
microsoft-aircraft-pilatus-pc6 Microsoft_Pilatus_PC6_Gauge_Skis 0.4
microsoft-aircraft-pilatus-pc6 Microsoft_Pilatus_PC6_Gauge_Wheels 0.4
microsoft-aircraft-spirit-of-st-louis Microsoft_Spirit_of_StLouis 0.4
microsoft-aircraft-wright-flyer Microsoft_Wright_Flyer 0.4
2 Likes

Thanks for sharing, that is a lot of 0.4 for very different airplanes… :sweat_smile:

I don’t say this will revolutionize the whole MSFS flightmodel but it certainly looks like an overlooked value.

Just hoping MS/Asobo gonna take a look into their SDK and maybe update it + inform developers if they agree.
(But still no feedback on the SDK post)

2 Likes

Yes, and I also noticed three were conspicuous by their high values, and all of them are first party.

1 Like

It certainly does help in a lot of areas. One thing I noticed pretty much immediately was pitch stability during wheel landings with tailwheel aircraft. I used to blame tendency to bounce on issues of weight/balance, lift slope issues, and suspension. While these still may be problematic with a few aircraft, it didn’t help that lateral fuselage drag was significantly under-represented, letting the fuselage drop so easily when the wheels touch even with very smooth landings.

2 Likes

Here is the answer from the SDK page:

The documentation will be updated with a new range, from 0.2 to 1.2, keep in mind that this is a recommended range and the value could be way above/under it but it will lead to unrealistic behavior.

The C172sp value will also change, 4.3 is indeed a mistake and it will be corrected in a future update.

Best regards

So this thread can get closed please,

we can continue further discussions and findings here:
Adverse Yaw | Slip | Aircraft list

7 Likes

Good work following up, small improvements like this add to over time.

3 Likes

Nice work! I see they kept the lower range so they don’t have to go back and change all the 0.4s. For me personally, I don’t see ever putting it below 0.7 unless the fuselage is literally absent or roughly the shape of a sphere or teardrop as with some ultralights.

2 Likes

Thread closed on request.

2 Likes