I’ve been using https://wabpro.cz/A320/ to get my flex temp and take off speeds for the FBW A320 and for some reason I cannot connect to the site anymore on any of my devices. It says ERR_SSL_PROTOCOL_ERROR.
Anyone else using this tool having the same issue? Is there a work around? Or an alternative program that I can use?
First: the wabro calculation is for an A320 CEO. You fly an A320 NEO. The numbers differ pretty much. So the wabpro FLX calculation is useless for the NEO anyway.
Second: FLX temp is not simulated correctly in the A32NX yet. You can insert a number there, and FLX takeoffs do use less power than TOGA takeoffs. But that’s it for now.
I have a same issue stop working since 2 days ago. tried few different network but seems the page generally gone off.
I would like to know how to calculate flex temp as well.
Yeah I can’t find any other calculator online either. At least I know the problem is not on my side. I guess I’ll have to learn it the old fashion way with charts.
I found a couple of videos explaining how to read them on YouTube. Here’s one that’s pretty good. https://youtu.be/hfEz3NXvFnw
Even though the sim doesn’t model flex temp, I would still like to learn all the procedures and pretend they work
Similar situation as me, at the beginning I thought I have a DNS cache problem or some anti-virus program blocking the website.
Thanks for sharing good information I learned a lot from the video.
Pretty much yes. I still put in a FLX temp, when I fly. Kind of in a realistic range regarding rwy length and weather conditions (around the 50s to late 60s range). I just don’t want to do TOGA takeoffs all the time.
Of course we are planning to make FLX working like IRL. But I don’t know when. Many other things have to work before. And we have to find solid data for that. Which is i bit more difficult with the Neo, than previous A320s (CEO).
I’ve just come across your website, I like it a lot.
Would you consider allowing user inputs for wind, rather than receiving the data from a METAR etc? E.g. during variable wind, I’ll program a worst case tailwind. Or even with a headwind, I don’t use the full headwind factor