I’ve stopped playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024, and I have to say, it’s been a frustrating experience. The biggest issue for me is the state of the default airports. While they might be a slight improvement over 2020’s, they’re still far from the level of quality I expect for a new sim. What makes this even more disappointing is that many of the addon airports (also features) I bought for 2020 are now deactivated, leaving me with far fewer options for realistic and immersive flying. Further making me uninterested in the new sim.
For those of us who invested time and money into creating a rich, detailed world in MSFS 2020, this feels like a huge step backward. The marketplace helped build personalisation to the sim. People could buy specific items that they found of interest. When 2024 was announced, backwards compatibility was promised, and many of us assumed we’d be able to carry over our favorite addon airports seamlessly. Instead, we’re stuck with basic versions of airports that are critical to the flight sim experience. It’s especially frustrating for Standard Edition users and those on Game Pass who don’t have access to premium upgrades. 2024 feels very generic for all users and with a flight sim being such a diverse game, no addons really makes it dull.
I’m not asking for a massive world update or new scenery across the board—at least not immediately—but Microsoft really needs to make the transition easier for players by reintroducing some key airports that are widely used and popular. For example:
• EGLL (Heathrow): One of the busiest and most iconic airports in the world, crucial for European and international routes.
• EGCC (Manchester): A major UK hub for short- and medium-haul flights across Europe.
• EHAM (Amsterdam Schiphol): Essential for anyone flying routes in and out of the Netherlands and beyond.
These airports, among others, are vital to the experience of flight simulation. Many of us spent years in 2020 building our addons library and flying to these detailed airports, and losing access to them without any alternatives has left 2024 feeling incomplete. By adding more of these key locations—even just a few to start—it would allow players to feel more invested in 2024 and see it as a viable upgrade. For those who may only have the standard edition or rely on addons for their experience.
Right now, 2024 feels more like a stripped-down version of 2020 rather than a significant leap forward. Even if the new features and aircraft have potential, the lack of quality and variety in default airports holds the game back. If Microsoft wants players to transition, they need to show that 2024 offers something better for all users—not just those willing to reinvest in addons.
A few small changes, like enabling these crucial airports and releasing some widely used ones as high-quality updates, would go a long way toward restoring confidence in 2024. For now, though, it’s hard to see why anyone who enjoyed 2020 would make the jump. I hope Microsoft takes this feedback into account because 2024 has the potential to be great—it just needs to respect the investment players have already made and offer a more complete experience out of the box.