Are players asking too much?

[ArcanePython931]

@GUNFLIGHT

@ArcanePython931

Depends on time and place. I can spend a night freaking around to minimize a rudder flaw on Kitfox… restarting with different authority settings… other times I love to land a Boeing 979 inappropriately, crush some farms and put that on video… or I play around flying near windmills… whatever… I do what I like.

I like to play around too. I love to fly under bridges at high speed. Oh wait…you can’t do that still. Or maybe the new eiffel tower in France. You know the new scenery they just added. Oh you can’t do that either…lol. That one threw me. In most releases I would go right to the Golden gate and do loops around it in a extra 300 or something with power. These are ridiculous issues to me. They shouldn’t exist in the first place, let alone be allowed to continue to exist. Yet they add apocalyptic scenery to the FLYING GAME.

No offence, but you’re selling a lot of bogus here pal … just tested it, no sweat

For bridges and flying under, someone is collecting places that DO ALLOW flying under, see

Fly Under / Through Structures

My first post on these forums involved looking for folks who are “distracted” by bridges. If I would have done my research properly, I would heard about the famous invisible wall before stuffing up plane after plane. Ah well, I did run across a few where it is possible. Thankfully, I’ve pretty much given up on the urge to try every bridge. But there is still the need to do more than just fly over and around. I simply have to give under and through a try on occasion. Instead of bridges, I s…

Newest challenge: flyable, but really difficult… try Adolphe Bridge, Luxemburg Stad.