You are right, my mistake. Sorry
They main reason they are aware of these bugs is because so many people were âimpatientâ enough to vent their annoyance on these forums.
It is a fact nowadays that it is only the people who make most noise who get their way, and not only in flight simming. Sadly, anger is the new complaint process.
Thus far all those acknowledged in this manner have always been fixed after every update, some took a bit longer, like the altitude bug, but it was also fixed in the end.
How do you know? We donât have any data to compare, as people are constantly complaining by default.
The only picture that shows an unrealistic cloud formation near the ground is picture 17/9/20.(towering cumulus at ground level)
I consider all others to be possible in reality.
Just look at the past updates and hotfixes which followed. The CTDs around Andrews was one instance where they acknowledged the feedback from the forums (which you label as impatience), but further than this the hotfixes are virtually always linked to those bugs most complained about.
Iâm not saying this is a bad thing - in limited testing they (often surprisingly) miss the most obvious bugs, and they would certainly be stupid not to look at the forums after a release, and take action accordingly. In effect, they now rely on the impatience of the customers to fill the gap in their own Quality Control.
All of us (including you) benefit by this reaction.
Feedback, especially the constructive kind is always good. Comments like âthis sim is totally brokenâ , âworst update in the whole wide worldâ and stuff like that is not feedback. It is whining . Full Stop!
When I read âall the clouds are totally â â â â nowâ and see pictures that show the exact opposite, I wonder if the comments should not have been " I added so many add-ons, changed so many âcfgâsâ and overclocked my system to the point where my GPU reduces my heating bill, I lost totally sight of what Iâve done now. Must be the Sim.
And there is the always favorite âre-installed windows, the sim, (put your own choice here) 4 times now and still nothingâ We all know what doing the same thing repeatedly expecting different results really meansâŠ
just my $0.02
Great news, credit for realising fixes were needed sooner rather than later and putting the work in, thanks. It might have saved a lot of high blood pressure to post a quick message saying they were working on this, but this seems to be how these guys like to communicate for whatever reason. The end result is what matters, fingers crossed it does what it says on the tin.
Thanks to the forum for making it loud and clear what the main issues were and how much of a gamebreaker they were - there wouldnât be a hot fix without so much noise being made (especially in December!) and the developers have acknowledged they monitor the forums to see where the biggest issues are. Plenty here told us weâd have to wait until SU8 in Feb and should just accept it - now we donât have, so everyone playing the game owes some thanks (again) to those not being dissuaded from speaking up. Hopefully those determined to downplay things can reflect on why their confident predictions havenât borne out.
Now weâve been through this however many times, letâs all of us learn from past experience how to be better. Yes those of us raising issues can be more civil, I hold my hands up, but it doesnât help having to constantly battle posts trying to shutdown discussion of the issue. Perhaps some could pause in future before jumping into bug threads with the assertion that thereâs no problem (when they couldnât possibly know that), then posting photos from a non-comparable situation with âlooks fine to meâ even when a problem has been well established, then when denying a problem becomes impossible asserting that it really isnât a big deal, then as it becomes clear it is serious trying to dissuade people from posting, to be patient and stop complaining and wait for the next update, and finally when the developers acknowledge the gravity of the issue, trying to claim the forum was irrelevant in their response. It gets really old and causes so much unnecessary heat, antagonism and discussion going round in circles.
Thatâs what the Zen desk is for. Constantly complaining on the forums about the same thing over and over and over again (frequently by the same people) is just negativity for the sake of negativity.
Step One- If you have a bug, report it to the Zen desk.
Step Two (Optional)- Discuss (not whine) it in the forums to see if otherâs have the same issue (you might be unique, or close to it), if anyone might have any suggestions, and if anyone knows of any workarounds or fixes.
The constant whining only serves to (maybe) make the whiners feel better, and to drive other people (like me!) away from the forum. And I donât mean that as a hypothetical, my usage recently is down dramatically because Iâm tired of all the whining about the same things over and over and over again.
And every update thereâs always (usually the same people) the gripers and complainers and conspiracy theorists as well.
I donât defend Asobo or MS. I just set my expectations to be more realistic, now that weâve gone through seven of these.
Keep in mind a LOT of people who told any of us about âweâll have to wait until Februaryâ truly have zero idea about anything Asobo does or does not do.
A lot of the forums are just pointless speculation or conjecture.
In truth most of the issues acknowledged in this announcement are ones that they already knew they had broken in SU7 before it was released.
But they released it anyway.
Most of not all were in the âknown issuesâ of the SU7 release notes.
Now they are going to do an open beta for this âasap but timeframe unknown Hotfixâ
To what end? Why bother testing at all if time and again the beta testers actually identify issues which the update then ships with unfixed?
Why not just release this âasap Hotfixâ in whatever state itâs in right now already? After all this appears to be their usual method.
This is different than jumping to fix stuff based on constant shouting and complaining.
They very much follow the bugs section here (via community managers) and get the input for the bug-log through ZenDesk. This is known, and I wasnât arguing against that kind of bug reporting. Just against the dozens and dozens of complaining topics on the already reported and acknowledged issues here in the general discussion.
As an example, someone just recently was complaining about some old bug here and was replied by one of our loudest friends here with a link to the bug report post, as an example how long it has not been fixed and how âAsobo donât do anythingâ. The bug report had 138 votes and had been open for months. It just wasnât a bug that would be high on the prio-list of the team due to low priority among us.
They have added the known issues to the list as they have become known after the update. I remember asking one of them to be added and it did. Clearly it was a wrong decision, as (some) people have since then jumped into conclusion âthey knew all along!â
There were issues which were known right out of the box. Before release and which were part of the âknown issuesâ notes at moment of release
TrackIR being one of them.
VR toolbar issue is another.
Indeed there are quite a few. All included on day 1 in the known issues of the release notes which you can read here and scroll back through the edits to the original.
I only see that the point that interests me since january the most has been in the same position for months due to new problems. If nothing happens before XP12, that was it for me with FS.
Hmm, yes, you are right, I stand corrected. I also checked in the wayback macine.
Which one is that, out of interest?
I know how you feel, freezing controls and artifacts are almost gamebreaking for me (im avoiding to update my gpu drivers since july to keep the sim running)
but it seems like this issues are forgotten while new bugs are added.
I have been updating my GPU drivers constantly, no issues until now. Funny thing about them is that you can always roll back with very little effort.