Hi all,
I’ve been reading this since the first post and the replies thereafter but didn’t have time to respond earlier on. I think this is an excellent point and I also acknowledge that @tamalien and @Nyx1819 have provided some insightful responses.
If I may, I’d like to offer some constructive feedback - and if deemed actually useful, have it passed up the chain of command to be considered moving forward.
Firstly, I do recognised that this forum is basically run by volunteers - I think there may be some merit in investigating the ratio of Forum Users, Active Posts/Threads vs Moderators (particularly with reference to multiple threads covering the same topic) and assess the requirement for additional moderators, or even having official MS Staff come onboard.
On this note, I have seen possibly 5 to 10 threads all covering the live weather issues. I’ve been involved in about 3 of them. DirectX 12, which is something I’m particularly interested in, has seen about 4 threads now. As it’s been mentioned, with constant new threads on the same topic, It does start to dilute the issue, if looking purely at votes.
Whilst I’m happy to see the issues acknowledged by the MS/Asobo team, I’m not sure having 5 topics just on the Live Weather/Wind not working, all with 300+ posts is a good use of resources. (As noted in the linked Dev Update)
ZenDesk, Known Issues, Forum Posts and Development updates (on the main page)
There is a duplication, or more specifically a triplication of information here.
As it stands, You can access known issues from 4 different locations (as per above)
This seems an unnecessary increase of workload when the information could be all contained in one location. This would also make updating the information easier (which I will come to) - The other side is the bug in the CDN (Content Delivery Network?) in which trying to load the main page doesn’t always bring you the latest data. This can be largely solved through implementing it on the forum.
Coming back to Known issues list - I think maybe a twice-a-week update for the net few months may be beneficial, particularly taking into note the major topics being submitted to ZenDesk. I know speaking first hand, if I know an issue has been submitted identical to that which I’m experiencing is already being addressed, I’m not going to add another ticket to create an additional unnecessary workload for the team actioning them.
There may be better or more suitable alternatives to the forum software currently used, ZenDesk or whatever other utilities are being used, but I’m sure if they can be found, MS and Asobo would be able to decide what works best.
I’m sure that if Asobo and Microsoft are indeed in this for the long haul, there are many customer-facing utilities and interfaces which could be vastly improved, along with more transparent communication, which would benefit Asobo, Microsoft and their customers alike.
I’m also happy to help out in anyway I can and for this information to be used if beneficial to the team as I’m also invested in seeing this platform mature and grow.
Thank you for your time,
Brendan.