I find this culture odd, i.e, that we laud a developer for quickly responding to a screw up by sending a quick revision or hotfix. How about not screwing up in the first place.
This is why I buy from JF if I can. Even if itâs not a JF product, they earn my purchases by being excellent.
Excellent at what? not issuing an update for years. then botching the 2024 version. I too like JFâs products in the past, but no hooray for this go round.
Is Inibuilds aware they have released this plane?
It has glaring bugs that are very easy to fix and not only they havenât issued a fix, they havenât said a single word about it.
I hope this was not done by the same team that murdered the Mu-2 because then we are toast without any updates or improvements coming.
Are they,
UNPAID TESTERS?
excellent examples..did Justy flight as for movies??
I have no idea - I know Iâm not paid but I do the job the best I can regardless, due to a certain integrity, values like trust and respect, and love of flight sim and aviation.
I did some experimenting with getting the avionics in the modern cockpit running from cold and dark.
I found that while I could never get them to start up when first loading in, if I did Restarts then turned on the battery and avionics in quick succession, I could in a few tries or less get the avionics running.
My initial thought was that the tablet would have to be turned on first, but my last trial was without turning on the tablet and I still got the avionics up.
Those of you who have watched Two Tone Murphyâs streams will be familiar with the phrase, âSixty percent of the time, it works every time.â
But Iâd hate to have to muck about like that for ever. Wouldnât it be nice if iniBuilds fixed it?
InterestingâŠ
I got a similar â60% of the time it works every timeâ with the GNS being able to switch between GPS and VLOCâŠ
âŠwithout reverting back to VLOC (MSFS 2024).
Sometimes it works just fine, sometimes it stays in VLOC no matter what.
For the version from Inibuilds, itâs here:
[community]\inibuilds-aircraft-spartan\Resources\Documentation
Obviously that doesnât help with Marketplace. Iâd hit up IniBuilds support or their forum and point out they need to make the manual accessible for Marketplace purchasers. Man, I wish MS would follow through with their promise to make aircraft optionally downloadableâŠ
Tell me youâve never developed software on a modern platform without saying youâve never developed software on a modern platform.
(IE: Being 100% problem free would require not having both an operating system and a game engine that donât always work as documented â if the features youâre using are documented at all.)
If these companies were smart, though, theyâd have a few avid users as final beta testers. I have a couple of small devs Iâve done some testing for, and itâs like writing: You work on an article for so long you get blind to some of the details because youâve seen it so much. Youâve built the entire Empire State Building, so at the end, you missed the fact that the bathrooms on the 39th floor donât work and elevator #27 has two 13th floor lights. (But whatâs surprising is when they also donât notice that the ground-floor entrance doesnât open!)
I have a vague memory of hearing that downloadable assets would be coming in Sim Update 3.
I might drop iniBuildsâ support a line. That actually worked for me with another aircraft, so you never know.
Not so keen on signing up for their forum. One more login to lose track of - I really must get myself a Rolodex (yes, Iâm old enough to remember those).
Same for me.
However, if we want that ini eventually fixes all the (not few) bugs discussed in this thread, it would not be wise not to use their support forum as one of the channels to reach them
Whatâs this âwiseâ of which you speak? Have I been missing something all these years?
the double ânotâ always ties me up, too
This was my exact same thought reading that post. There are far more permutations than a small beta team could ever hope to cover in testing so bugs are inevitable (and this becomes increasingly true the more complex the simulation). However, that being said, it seems like QC definitely missed some low hanging fruit before pushing this thing out the door. Getting a gauge string sized and placed properly (i.e. the fuel computer) simply shouldnât have been overlooked. This is coming from someone who has done my fair share of development in the FS9/FSX days.
Iâm sure all your work has always been perfect⊠Itâs so easy!