In what way would it be a bad idea to have a live copy of 2024 available for a little ad hoc verification of their Q&A claims during livestream?
Something like:
Jorg: We fixed the PC24 in our Patch #3
Moderator: Well, let’s just take a look and see
Or better yet
Moderator: Here (handing Jorg the mouse)… show us
Pretty sure they have access to the sim… 
Of course. In what way would it be a bad idea as I described above, ad hoc verification of claims? They’d probably be less inclined to make certain claims if they’re to be shown false in a livestream with a few mouse clicks
And if so: How it is even possible that they are claiming twice, Tobii is fixed but its still not fixed ? Just one of a number of examples.
Its shocking the way they doing Quality Control and Testing these days.
Jorg: Tobi is fixed
Moderator: We have Tobi hooked up to 2024. Show us
Blockquote
Jorg: Tobi is fixed
Moderator: We have Tobi hooked up to 2024. Show us** **
Jorg: Oh, that’s unexpected
Its kind of “user experience” … experience what user experience with MS2024.
except they would surely run it in a humongous rig with some badass gpu with 48gb vram,
there you go.. see? it works
PC24’s continuing issues post Patch #3 won’t disappear with Jorgs monster machine. It’ll just “not work” faster
No NASA PC, no nothing could get it work. …
Blockquote
It’ll just “not work” faster
This made my day. But, its not faster, its smoother ^^
ha.. you are probably right
Back to topic and to be serious:
I love this idea!
When developers deploy a fix, it is a fix. sometimes a bug can be related to many issues, one got fixed, but the other issue still not, that does not mean the first one did not got fixed.
as for showcasing fixes in livestreams, thats unrealistic, because every live is about dont know 1.5 - 2 hours? you want to double that? beside, its not a trust exam.
what really can be asked for, a quality, features, to gain the trust.
What about Tobii isn’t working? I’ve heard this before but I have Tobii and I’ve never had a problem with it in this sim.
You might be right, but i have the feeling their way of
a) getting all the bugs doesnt work … the template forum posting might be
the wrong way; if there is a sorting in/out tagging procedure by 3rd persons not directly involved in development… maybe they throw simlar sounding bugs in one bucket but they are different
b) There isnt any kind of Quality Check and Testing before release (neither the main game, nor the patches)
The SDK Dev way works much better … there are the devs directly connected to the community … not like here what is like (not meant to offend someone) calling a hotline and talking to someone who has no idea about the stuff they got reported…
This topic was automatically closed 365 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.