OpenXR Toolkit (upscaling, world scale, hand tracking...) - Release thread

[RomanDesign]

@ResetXPDR

There is no confusion. OXR at 100% for the 4090 (and 4080) with a Reverb G2 is 3152 X axis. As soon as you start using OXRTK resolution override, you are telling WMR to ignore this setting and use the resolution you have manually set instead.

Ah, thanks for that clarification. Makes sense now.

@ResetXPDR

4658 X axis equates to (4658 / 3152) ^ 2 * 100 = 218% OXR render resolution equivalent.

So, maybe I supersampled a bit too much. No need to overstress GPU either. OXR 200% = 4458x in OXRTK then. And OXR 150% you’re using is 3860x, unless I did the math wrong… Maybe I can do DLSS Balanced with that resolution…

@mbucchia

Plus it also gives you per-app control (a la SteamVR) which is always nice.

Yes, that’s already justifies its existence. Also, I’d add another advantage to that: I can change it right in VR (with a quick off-on VR trigger that can be mapped to a voice command), no need to take it off and go to desktop - which for me means extracting myself from my motion rig, walking to PC and then inserting myself back.

@E1D1D1L

With my 4090 I am using 5000x… resolution override, OXRTK CAS at 35 and MSFS FidelityFX at 140, all with DLSS Performance. No MR with frame rate cap 45 FPS in the Nvidia control panel.

Wow, that’s a lot! I wonder if that much supersampling can yield more sharpness than a lower settings, considering G2 resolution.

@HugeMercury163

With my G2 and a 4090 I’m using 4000x or 160% OXR and either DLSS Quality or Balanced and things look incredibly sharp in the G2’s sweet spot, 30fps with MR is stable.

That sounds more reasonable, I’m going to try that.