Two main dislikes - the control set up requires a PHD in Logic and does not fit in with the older age group who are users - and Australia is still the Bing Map of 2013 ![]()
After a very good start I tried the career, unfortunately it is unusable on xbox, the free flight is now quite fluid but the scenario continuously loads, in career you have 10fps and continuous jerks. I still donāt understand why they canāt free the career from 10,000 useless missions by simply allowing us to choose the plane and route (like in free flight) and calculate a rating/reward at the end of the flight. Why complicate life so much to force me to take a short 5h30minute VIP jump?
Yes, exactly what I am seeing as well, without Process Lasso. Just w25H2 and 9900X3D CPU with 5090RTX. .33 was so smooth, .34 messed it up.
What I do not get is, they use BETA Testing phase, then release a nice buildā¦.and AFTER that, they released 2 further non BETA Tested builds wich mess it up againā¦.
Common Asoboā¦what is this mess?
.34
.33 (so the prior build)
I donāt think a PHD in logic would halp at all
I have tried several times to figure how it works, and have given up. The user interface for controls is about as confusing as itās possible
At this point Iād be ecstatic if my 1% lows were 75% of my average FPS - which is sad⦠![]()
Mine are 44% and itās driving me crazy. And Iāve never seen such huge, repetitive drops in FPS (down from 68 FPS to 20 FPS, accompanied by audio and video stutters, all throughout a flight.)
Iāve done everything I can think of to my computer. Nothing fixes it.
Something is terribly wrong with 1.6.34.0 that was not wrong with 1.6.33.0
I voted in the polls.
Needless to say, I gave it a 1 for performance (Iād give it a 0 if I could.)
I also gave it an 8 for stability, since Iām not seeing freezes or CTDās. Then again, I almost never have.
Iām on 9800X3D and 5090 and the sim right now is smooth as butter. Zero stutters from start to finish on flights 2-3 hours on Fenix A320.
9800X3D, RTX 5090 Astral OC, 64GB RAM, 4TB NVME, 4K+Ultra settings with TLOD 300, LG C5 42 inch TV, Set refresh rate to 100 in Nvidia CP, Set FPS limit to 100 in Nvidia App, Gsync disabled in Nvidia app and set to monitor refresh rate, Set FPS limit in game settings to 50 and Frame Gen on 2X. Rolling cache set to 64GB. With that, I get smooth constant 100 fps from start to finish.
Something turned aircraft traffic on for me.?? Had to go and turn it off again to save some VRAM, was having screen freezes
my feedback on SU4 after flying a few days: It keeps getting more stuttery over the days. Iām not sure if its because I activated the Stranger Things addon in search of the 'āweather improvements x Stranger Thingsā - whatever that meansā¦
The āweatherā is terrible⦠at least on X Box flying a C172 below 10k feet in the USA. The clouds have no connection to actual weather. I took off from KMTH and flew towards Miami where there should have been a 25k foot overcast with a few low altitude clouds but instead there were some large cumulus at low altitude and extremely sparse translucent smears at higher altitude and the large cumulus dissappeared as I flew past them and then the sky became mostly clear and then, as I turned back south, the large cumulus reappeared.
A similar thing happened as I flew north from Boca Raton to Orlando Executive: the skies were clear except for haze and then giant low altitude cumulus appeared ā and they always look pretty much the same and they are always planted between me and the largest airport in the area. The idea of being able to see distant weather conditions has been completely destroyed for me on my X Box. If cloud conditions exist then those conditions should be visible from more than a few miles and they should also be constant (not huge cumulus then clear then huge cumulus again - especially in non convective weather)
The weather is not the real world weather and its a terrible portrayal of any kind of fake weather. It is a joke. Winds are back to doing that thing where they can be strong out of the north for the entire area but yet moderate out of the south at the airport itself. I really thought that got solved at one point.
The distance at which PG can be seen is generally fantastic but the quality of that PG is pretty bad. I am glad that things are mostly geometrically sound but they still have a tendency towards looking like the teeth of the snow monster from Rudolph the Red Nosed Reindeer. Their textures stays pretty low in many cases until you are on top of them. Some areas are better than others. I really donāt know what the issue is.
The C172 seems good. I havent checked other favorites. Overall this update is good I think but I keep looking at pics I took about a year ago and I have no idea what weāve gained. I donāt fly airliners and I donāt care about Stranger Things - donāt fly helicopters much either - and the only thing I would actually appreciate is a joke with apparently scripted cloudscapes badly designed.
its my two cents ā you have yours - I have mine.
Because of the broken dispatcher, itās impossible to finish the mission, and this is the 5th time Iāve wasted time. I just landed in Dublin, but the dispatcher doesnāt see me, and the mission failed when I tried to take off and re-land⦠Whatās the way out? alt+f4, so that you can earn some money and not lose your rating? There should be an option to end the mission forcibly, you can stand near the gate for an infinite amount of time.
After SU4, Career mode seems to have got worse, mission failures, CTdās and dings left and right. I am not flying Career until we get an update or some fixes.
Itās a reported bug. You cannot update the last plane you chose, because that plane is locked by the menu.
So choose a ballon, then update the library for the Cessna. If that fails reboot and repeat.
Better than before but still stutters in airports when taxiing or moving between cockpit custom views - not improving by toning down settings. Not a VRAM issue for me (usually at 50%) - it is a Mainthread problem. Running a RTX 4080 and i7-13700 CPU with 64g RAM and a 300 mbs connection. Starting to wonder if it is a matter of weak CPU compared to GPU. Setting fps at 40, TLOD / OLOD 150 , low traffic and parked aircraft.
Very few other players visible in flight - both live traffic and all traffic scenarios. Across two flights today across Central Europe I saw two other planes mid flight and they completely disappear when 5-10 miles away. Xbox x. A320n
Iām upset with SU4. I canāt seem to figure out the stuttering when panning the camera. In devtools, you can see how when switching the camera to FMS, for example, VRAM is aggressively unloaded, and when returning the camera, I get stuttering and twitching for a second or more. I donāt want to fly in the 2024 simulator yet, Iāll be back to MSFS 2020.
When?? You announced it first on SIM Update 3 and now on 4 and still no heavy cargo. I see there are other issues with performence etc. but i personily buyed MSFS 24 for the Carrer Mode and still this mode is broken as fā¦. When will this be fixed and can you tell when at least heavy cargo comes?
I have also the annoying stuttering Problem with SU 4 while panning the camera. It seems to be scenery dependend. San Diego is okay while Bern Switzerland is a stutter mess for me.
Tell me pls, is this the default scenery? I would like to test
No Samscene3D US modern cities is added. But since it adds more load to the scenery IT should not affect it since it runs better than Standard Bern scenery.
Yes, Switzerland is unfortunately a big mess, with poorly functioning PG cities/airports and beautiful, as well as less beautiful, TIN-landscapes. Zurich, however, has improved in Su4.
After completely reinstalling MSFS, the flight yoke was still not recognised at first. However, this was due to a faulty flight yoke driver installation in Windows and not the flight simulator, and I was able to resolve it.
Issues encountered so far: Various ships stacked on top of each other and protruding into buildings in the port of Rotterdam (possible conflicts between SeaFront Vessels 2024 and GAIST7?). I am also still trying to find suitable settings for the Tobii Eye Tracker 5, which occasionally does not respond to head movements. This was not a problem before SU4.



