What new Warbirds would you like to see?

The “What Other GA Aircraft would you like to see” has been around forever and shows how interesting and eclectic the communities tastes are. I am fairly new into warbirds here but as an retired (40yr) military aircraft engineer the genre has become my absolute favourite. Just to get the ball rolling I list a few of my top picks:

DH98 Mosquito - a must for me.

Bell P39 Airacobro might be interesting.

Blackburn Buccaneer S2B - just imagine sneaking up on all of those fancy carriers at 50ft and 550kts.

Handley Page Victor B2 (although a version swappable between the bomber and tanker fits might increase the appeal for IFR of the Bucc)

Hawker Hunter FGA9

5 Likes

Anything but developed by A2A. Their P47 and B-17 would be nice in FS2024. Shame it will probably never happen.

7 Likes

Would still love a Jet Provost!

3 Likes

I like your choices!
Mosquito for sure.

I’ve been fascinated by this plane ever since I saw it in ‘Godzilla Minus One’.

Might be hard to get access to, since only one original Kyushu J7W1 Shinden (Magnificent Lightning) prototype still exists, and is not in flying condition. The sole survivor is in the collection of the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum.

3 Likes

Beechcraft 1900D

Not a warbird. Or did they hide some cannons somewhere? :grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes:

1 Like

Panther Jet F9f. Korean War era.

2 Likes

Is that what makes it a warbird then? Guns’n’missiles?
The 1900D was used extensively by the military all over the world.

F8F Bearcat!

7 Likes

I would love to see someone do a Lockheed Ventura. It would go great with the AH Lancaster and upcoming AH B-25J Mitchell. The Ventura was real handful and quite the hotrod twin bomber. I would love to see a really well done Hawker Hunter, Gloster Meteor and a CF-100 Canuck with high fidelity cockpits.

3 Likes

Messerschmitt Me 262 Schwalbe (minus the tail symbol)

3 Likes

I’d like to see a A-26 as well as a P-36. A Griffon powered variant of the Spitfire would also be most welcome.

2 Likes

Well then I stand corrected. I’ve always thought of ‘warbirds’ as combat-capable aircraft.

For example, I don’t think of the Cessna Citation as a ‘warbird’ even though it’s used to ferry military dignitaries around as the UC-35A/B (Army) and UC-35C/D (Marine Corps).

But I see your point.

3 Likes

You may be surprised to hear that my Corolla is also a Muscle Car!

2 Likes

Turbos and nitrous? :grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes:

Typically the Warbird definition was a propeller driver (but not always) WWII aircraft created for the purpose of war. Mostly fighters, interceptors, etc, sometimes bomber are included in the designation as well. Cargo aircraft like the DC3 (C-47) were not included.

1 Like

It is a bit like saying that only those on the front line should get a medal and not the transport corps or stretcher bearers etc.

If you Google it, a warbird is a retired former military aircraft -

“…extended to include all airworthy former military aircraft, including jet-powered aircraft and helicopters.”

2 Likes


4 Likes

OK, you win.
I said “I stand corrected” in a previous post.
Our opinions differ on what makes a ‘warbird’ a ‘warbird.’
No need to keep arguing the point.

1 Like