During multiple long-haul test flights in SU4 Beta (latest build) using both the Inibuild A330-200 and A330-300 (aircraft version 6.26), we observed a severe and reproducible fuel-burn anomaly that does not align with displayed fuel-flow indications, SimBrief data, or real-world A330 performance.
1. Unrealistic Fuel Depletion vs. Displayed Fuel Flow
At cruise, both variants show fuel flow around 5,500ā6,000 lb/hr per engine, which is consistent with real-world A330-200/300 performance.
However, actual fuel depletion during flight is 50ā60% higher than what the ECAM engine page indicates.
Example from our Zurich (LSZH) ā Shanghai Pudong (ZSPD) test flight:
-
Loaded ~164,000 lbs of fuel (SimBrief +10% contingency)
-
At TOC, FOB was ~130,000 lbs
-
Within ~7 hours, FOB dropped to 0ā800 lbs, triggering LAND ASAP
-
Actual burn rate calculated from depletion: ~18,500 lb/hr total,
or ~9,250 lb/hr per engine, far above realistic A330 cruise consumption
This strongly suggests that displayed FF is incorrect, and the aircraft is burning significantly more fuel in the background than indicated.
2. Behavior Consistent With a Simulated Fuel Leak
During the LSZHāZSPD flight, the aircraft behaved exactly as if experiencing a major fuel leak:
-
FOB decreased at an extreme linear rate unrelated to displayed FF
-
MCDU predicted EFOB rapidly dropped into negative territory
-
āLAND ASAPā appeared despite normal engine indications
-
Changing CI, optimizing climb, or encountering tailwinds did not improve depletion
-
The issue persisted after a clean restart and full SimBrief wind import
This points to a sim-level fuel system bug.
3. FMC Predictions Degrade Over Time
As the fuel mismatch grows, FMC predictions become unrealistic:
-
ETA drifts 2ā3 hours later than SimBrief
-
Remaining distance and fuel predictions diverge from reality
-
EFOB drops sharply even in stable cruise
-
Descent fuel planning becomes impossible
This drift occurred approximately 1ā2 hours after TOC during the LSZHāZSPD flight.
4. Reproducible Across Variants and Conditions
The anomaly occurred on:
-
A330-200 ā twice (Inibuild v6.26)
-
A330-300 ā once (the LSZHāZSPD flight)
-
SU4 Beta
-
Flights started cold & dark or from runway
-
With and without third-party scenery (including ZSPD)
-
Multiple SimBrief plans
-
Multiple cost index values
-
With full wind data imported
The behavior is not dependent on route, livery, payload, SimBrief profile, or setup.
5. Emergency Mid-Flight Refueling Required
During the LSZHāZSPD flight:
A +80,000 lb emergency fuel load was required to avoid flameout.
After refueling:
-
Burn rate remained abnormally high
-
Example: ~2,000 lbs lost in ~10 minutes during steady cruise
-
Displayed FF remained ~6,000 lb/hr per engine, not reflecting true depletion
Conclusion
The Inibuild A330 (v6.26) in SU4 Beta suffers from a severe fuel-burn miscalculation where:
-
Displayed FF is incorrect
-
Actual burn is ~50ā60% higher than indicated
-
FMC predictions progressively degrade
-
Long-haul flights (10ā13 hours) become impossible on maximum fuel
-
Aircraft behavior resembles a fuel leak despite no indication of one
This issue renders long-haul A330 flights non-viable without manual refueling, even with significant fuel contingency.