Put some comparison screenshots, follow the opener’s procedure. I tested it after SU-4, it worked.
This topic,
GOALS: The idea of this thread is to apply the pareto principle (20% of the effort produce 80% of the results) to keep most of the files on the HDD (or a slower SSD) and have only the few most often accessed files on the fastest SSD. OFF TOPIC: Of course, it’s obviously faster and ideal to just buy an additional new generation fastest NVMe SSD and install everything on a SSD: OFF TOPIC. We’re not trying in this thread to have the fastest possible startup time ever, but to allocate the content…
I did test it and I did see differences after SU-4.. check the Amsterdam images I posted, use LOD scaling at least 5.00000, the 4.0000 does not do much. Prove your point, dont teach me.
Well, I would still very much like to hear any words from the representatives of Asobo regarding this topic.
I’d love that also.. but I don’t think that will change peoples minds actually. They all make assumptions and keep to these assumptions, whatever Asobo/MS sais. A statement would be nice, but management does not solve issues. Developers do..