A GTx with G1000 is not a GTx. Having flown the real Kingair C90 (GTi version) I need to see Pro-line 21 as default from the factory, not some retrofit, I can’t live with that. There is plenty of documentation available on the PL21. Sorry I’m out.
1 Like
Folks - this is a work-in-progress. I think everyone needs to keep their powder dry and let the author get closer to a delivered solution. If you don’t like the product, contact the author directly, but do not use DMs. This isn’t a Customer Feedback channel, it’s for General Discussions of products.
6 Likes
Ok lets end this part right now, We are No way shape and form working with or a part of BT Sudios You will not I repeat WILL NOT have to own BT Studios product for ours We own are aircraft just the same as they own there’s. I can say for a fact what they have done with there aircraft and what we have done with ours is completely different.
We are bringing it out the way we want. We are just trying to go the extra step and seeing what the community want’s and dont want with Limitations. @anon50268670 As we have just seen your message and we was going to pm you due to your exp with this aircraft wanted to ask some question about it as well. Just Like you we want this aircraft to be as real as we can get. As the creator of the post posted there is a link to our discord, I will start a channel with information and your concerns about out progress, Can be posted there. as always we are here to see your comments and concerns. Because with out you guys we wouldn’t be here.
6 Likes
NO you will not have to purchase there model. If you want too support in purchasing it. By all means but you are not required to for this aircraft.
2 Likes
I LOVE twin turboprops. I have actually flown on King Air B200 many times, during my army service (not as a pilot, but rather as a tactical comm systems operator). Its been No 1 on my Wishlist, since the launch of MSFS back in 2020.
If the model will include realistic engine management (feathering, ITT, limitations and engine damage due to over torque), a proper electrical system with realistic loads, air conditioning, fuel imbalance effects, engine/bleed failures simulation - then it’s an instant buy. I will live with the state of G1000 NXi for now (its already quite good).
To summarize, I dream about a product with the level of fidelity which is close to the Airfoillabs 350 model from the competing platform. 
Good luck, dev team!
4 Likes
i feel so saddened i got burned and bought the c90 from a con artist.that up to this day is still unflyable.. seeing this makes me extremely happy, ill try my luck with this one when it releases as it looks extremely promising
1 Like
Yes I agree I enjoy Airfoillabs work, They are very skilled and great work.
2 Likes
Will this C90 have doors that can be opened?
1 Like
Not right off the bat, We are working main model, animations will be there Then will add in the toolbar window with the controls.
1 Like
Thanks for that.
Here is a little video of what we have done so far. please for give me Im not much of a talker, also there are still some ops in there with animations and so on. So just bare with us its very much a WIP
2 Likes
I know the developer has already corrected you, but I’m curious where you got this erroneous information? No offense intended as you of course as you were seemingly misled somewhere. You’re the first to mention BT Studios in this tread, and their Discord also makes no mention of it, on top of the developer confirming they have nothing to do with it.
Edited my comment, thanks for the clarification.
Will be watching your project’s progress with interest.
Woof ~ Woof & Salute!
Steiny
My grave error occured as i was monitoring the “other” King air, to see if the author would actually pull his pants up and work on it, and all offa sudden, out of the blue, a post appears from HIR3Dkiller1, freshly registered on the forum, with interior shots of an airplane brought out by the “other” king air maker (that BT sob).
I dont know “how” the interior shots or that post got there, (might have been an admin) but in the post there was mention about not liking the way the crowd had interacted with the developer of the “other” king air. So, turns out 1+1 wasn’t 3.. but 2 completely different airplane projects, merged over in that one. As this topic popped up i got increasingly hesitant in believing this was the real deal.
So, my sincere apologies for posting profanities, but at that point in time, i was convinced HK here, was actually BT in a new coat. Again, my apologies, i just hate unjust people who scam money out unknowing people. And yes, still bitter about sponsoring that fake Kitfox.
So, back to the topic at hand:
Look forwards to actually seeing this bird proper in the sim, sorry for the inconvenience, Hkiller1
1 Like
No worries! That makes sense how you got thrown off. I’m glad through this conversation we’ve at least been able to confirm it’s not BT in new clothing, that would definitely be cause for concern.
1 Like
We are currently Modeling The frames and more controls but wanted to show that we have the Working Title CJ4 avionics Working in our King Air C90
More Images Soon
8 Likes
Question,
will be there also that WTT G1000 version? Really don’t like that Collins and with WTT G1000 generally i expect more better and easy option.
That’s what’s in the photos of the G1000 is the wt g1000
I don’t use the default stuff
I know,
I just only asked if you didn’t change approach of built in equipment in your aircraft model after that posts with unrealistic G1000 
On other side I’ve discovered some bugs in WTT G1000 Nxi so no worry about time to have all ok