New Release: Pilot's Boeing B314 "The Clipper" Flying Boat

Discussion Hub Aircraft
, , ,
444

Thank you for the positive feedback as work continues on the upcoming B-314 v1.70 patch.

For those of you that are interested, we have a new version available now of the PILOT’S B-314 - The Clipper v1.7 Beta if you wish to test it.

The ChangeLog is as follows:

All models
Fuel pressure code updated.
Flight engineer panel fuel flow gauge needle animation fixed.
Flight engineer panel fuel flow gauge code updated.
Revised airspeed needle code that was erroneously calculating speed via MPH instead of knots. (new)
Fixed reversed aileron trim needle animation. (new)

B-314A Fixed First Officer compass that was INOP. (new)

Please download the update via your account at the PILOT’S website:

https://t1p.de/q9byl

If you notice anything worth reporting, I look forward to your feedback.

Jerome

6 Likes
446

Do not forget the SIAI Marchetti S55 and S55x, that one is also a very nice flying boat.

EDIT: Removed my comment as Pilot’s clarified and they are not charging for upgrades. They just said that the Dash7 for MSFS 2024 might have a higher price than the one in 2020, if you already own it then the upgrades are free as usual.

Thanks for the clarification Jerome!

2 Likes
448

Any such statement is totally incorrect and utterly ridiculous! Let me show you why:

b314_mcx_report_p3d
b314_mcx_report_p3d2560×1400 173 KB

The above shows the B-314 P3D model in Model Converter X and provides the following info on the actual 3D model:

The 3D model has 121390 Triangles
The 3D model has 125393 Texture Vertices

b314_mcx_report_msfs
b314_mcx_report_msfs1920×1050 75.5 KB

The above shows the B-314 MSFS model in Model Converter X and provides the following info on the actual 3D model:

The 3D model has 864606 Triangles
The 3D model has 643930 Texture Vertices

As you can see, the MSFS model of the B-314 is vastly more complex than the P3D model, they are completely different. Had the P3D model been ported over, as you suggest, then there would be no such difference!

No you did not, no such information was ever issued by PILOT’S! What the email said was the following:

We have been to Yellowknife with AirTindi and collected sounds as well as
other information, which will be added over the next months. New features of
MSFS 2024 are planned to be supported as well.

To cater for all that, the price will need to be adjusted.

So I thought I would take the opportunity to herewith invite you to order a
copy of our Dash 7 while it still has low SRP.

What this means is that if we make a specific Dash 7 Cargo variant, then this will be offered at an additional cost to those that already own the Dash 7 Passenger variant. It also means that If we introduce new features to the Dash 7 in MSFS 2024, that are MSFS 2024 specific, then our development work in those new features will translate to the Dash 7 having a higher price in MSFS 2024 for new customers, that do not already own the Dash 7 MSFS 2020 version.

To be clear, existing Dash 7 customers, that have purchased the Dash 7 Passenger variant for MSFS 2020, will NOT be charged any upgrade fee for the Dash 7 Passenger variant for MSFS 2024.

I appreciate your feedback on the B-314 for MSFS. In what way do you find the engine sounds disappointing, what would have to be changed for you to change your view on that? Regarding the radios, what improvements do you feel we could make that would make them better in your opinion, or improve their usability?

Jerome

7 Likes
449

Fair enough, I stand corrected on the modeling.

Retracted

As far as sounds, the starting windup abruptly changes to full running rumble, and the startup sequence that goes with that is abrupt too. There’s a short sputtering sound in there, but it seems to me like it’s played back at a slightly higher volume than the rest of the sounds. I’m not sure if I’m explaining myself well here.

You just start them and go, and no engines from that time period were that simple. There’s no starter to energize, no flywheels to mesh. It’s like starting a modern car.

I totally get wanting period correct radios but then they can’t quickly be tuned to modern frequencies, nor can the addon be used on VATSIM. Those are quality of life things, not exactly dealbreakers. But that does limit its usefulness.

1 Like
450

Hey Jerome,

I’m glad to see that work is continuing on the Clipper.

If I could fix one thing, would be the autopilot. I certainly understand that aircraft of that vintage did not have the capabilities that modern APs do, but for the life of me, I could not get the aircraft to hold heading within about 10 degrees.

And it was not ten degrees from where I engaged it, it was some random course, close to but not on the engagement heading.

I tried flying it from San Fran to Hawaii, but the course was too erratic to work with my ham handed Celestial Navigation, and I had to revert to the Late 631.

And I didn’t have an eager copilot to take a turn at the wheel for me either, unfortunately. :slightly_smiling_face:

1 Like
451

I did a short test flight around the San Francisco Bay this morning, and I want to retract my earlier comment, so I’ve deleted it. I believe I was unfairly harsh on this addon because it hasn’t received much attention. @PILOTSdev I apologize for my rudeness.

I’m just starting out on VATSIM and I’d love to be able to use this addon someday, after much more studying. If there were a toggle switch on the radio stack to allow for modern frequencies and a transponder, that would be fantastic. Hell, even if there was a toggle for a GNS unit somewhere hidden away, I’d be okay with that too. I understand that’s probably a super niche use case, and maybe not worth the dev time.

I’d love to see a bit more complexity in the engine startup sequence, like I mentioned.

It’s nice to have niche aircraft like this available, and I’m glad its getting some attention now.

4 Likes
452

I’ve seen these implemented in a few vintage aircraft via a clipboard/paper “EFB”. That would work well here without altering the integrity of the installed vintage equipment.

1 Like
453

Hi Deacon8tor,

Thank you for your feedback! Yes, I’m aware that this is a much desired feature that B-314 users want to see fully implemented, and this is currently being worked on. If things go according to plan, we should have a test version available sometime in the coming week that has such gyro features implemented.

Jerome

2 Likes
454

This is very welcome news!

I, too, have struggled with the AP’s behavior.

455

Thank you, I appreciate that!

I know the Latécoère 631 has a GNS in the cockpit, as does our Dash 7, and while I cannot promise that we will definitely implement such a feature, I will certainly look into it. If you have any ideas and feedback on where you think such a GNS might best fit and be added to the cockpit, I welcome whatever suggestions you may have and will take them on board.

A toggle switch for modern frequencies and a transponder might be feasible, I’m not sure what exactly we could do to add a bit more complexity in the engine startup sequence, I’ll look into that too, thank you for the feedback and suggestions!

Jerome

4 Likes
456

@PILOTSdev This is a small thing, but are the charts on the chart table tied to the model rather than the livery?

The South Pacific chart in the Cape Town Clipper and the North Atlantic chart in the California Clipper being wrong has always been a bit weird.

It would be really neat to have the chart of routes that each of them flew (especially for the Clippers) as the chart on the navigation table.

Looking through the manual and from what I’ve read here, the 314 you built for other sims has more systems depth. Is there any possibility of that being done for the MSFS version, potentially for 2024?

EDIT:

I’ve been up flying and finding that I’m getting the heading hold to behave, which I have always struggled with. Usually, when I disconnect it, alter course and then reengage it, it turns back to my original course. However, today it did that the first time, but subsequent times it seems to be behaving. I do find I have to disengage both AP levers, so the one to the left of the captain and the one to the right. Reading the manual, it would seem that only the left one is necessary to disengage/reengage the AP, which I’m not finding to be the case.

EDIT2:

I’m really looking forward to 2024’s improved water physics. I hope the flying boats can truly shine in the new sim.

2 Likes
457

If you got your copy of the B-314 through the Marketplace, is there a way to get the beta? It does not show up in my Pilots account nor in the Content Manager. The only download available is the Seaports. Thank you.