Not sure if you know but is a very good one available in DCS. It is an outstanding module and a very accurate representation of the aircraft. It would be great to see the same here in MSFS.
Yeah I know that, im also trying to improve some freeware on xplane, cause it will be awesome to fly it on vatsim, as part of a vatsim special ops team as I am, so, yeah, it will be great to have it on msfs, or to do some aerobatics as the “patrulla águila” for special days or memorials.
A steam guage Bonanza
There is one …
I remembered that after I posted. I have their Debonair 35 (non-v) version and for some reason I’ve never fallen in love with it.
That’s a comic book caricature of a Bonanza, not a proper version. Stay clear!
What makes you say that? I haven’t flown it for many months but seem to remember it felt pretty good and lively. You talking about the systems or?
The visual design of the model. The nose is too short and snubby and other proportions are also wrong (for example the smallest window is too small and positioned wrong and the tail is too thick and short as well).The cockpit looks quite cartoonish as well.
All in all it looks like a Funko Pop plastic toy version of the Bonanza. At that point I don’t even care about what the flight models feels like. 
I often do an entire 3 hour flight session without once going to external view but point taken, the proportions are definitely out a bit.
I know when it was first released there were a lot of comments about the look. I know the developer modified it, but maybe it’s still not accurate.
I personally don’t think it is bad, but it just isn’t on par with my other payware planes. If Black Square makes an analog mod of the default Bonanza I think I’d use that a lot.
I believe A2a and Carenado both made V tailed versions in FSX/P3D. It would be nice if either of them made a MSFS version.
The generation of Supersonic passenger transport is almost here, how long before a Dev makes this?
Definitely a DeHavilland Heron -
( although that’s a conversion with new engines )
Where would you even operate something like that from? I’ve seen art for these 1000 seat airliners before, and they seem so wide they couldn’t use existing airport terminals. Perhaps it’s just an optical illusion, and it’s not as wide as it looks.
Wingspan is the same as a 747 on the largest airframe renderings suggested but these planes can be any size. The difference is the fuselage.
Because the total airframe provides lift the span can be reduced compared to the tube liners.
Much more efficient to fly these - safer too - with a much better glide ratio if there were engine failure.
But then if these were accurately modeled in MSFS we could see for ourselves about all of it, airport access, in flight performance and economy, glide ratio, capacity and on and on
C-17, C-5, and a C 130
F5 Tiger
Mirage III with the modifications by Swiss air forces.
M-346 (jak-130)
C-130
Is that some new fangled airship or blimp ?