I went for the PC 24
I have many many hours in the 320N when I used to do free flight so the PC feels different enough which is what I wanted
That said. The world now has loads of VIP flights so I imagine a couple of them will allow me to buy a CJ to perhaps base in another continent
PC24 is a great plane for career mode, probably the least bugs and career mode killers of all the fleet that is jet engine
Brilliant, yes VIP has loads all over the world.
Plus, buy a few more when you can because I will 
% guarantee you will either loose a plane or 2 through no fault of your own or be forced to pay many credits to repair a crash you did not cause.
I’m not being a pessimist about 2024, it’s reality and just a fair warning about the many bugs that will tax your game.
The others will earn passive income, but there is a point at which owning too many starts to cost you time and credits to repair the passive planes.
You will need then to move onto airliners to pay for them. Then think about how much time you want to waste repairing them all.
Congratulations with your purchase and happy flying. 
i’d highly recommended an iniBuilds A320neo v2.0 as your first airliner, because:
the iniBuilds A320neo v2.0 is actually pretty decent, stable, and very reliable. it doesn’t have any enormous, embarrassing or egregious errors in its systems or avionics. it’s no Fenix, but it’s not too far removed from the excellent freeware FlyByWire A32NX.
sigh. here’s a new one.
YMML → YPPH. here’s the flightplan MSFS drew up for me (i’ve stopped using SimBrief with airliners because MSFS’s AIRAC is always outdated so the import doesn’t work 9 times out of 10).
first line, first error. apparently FL360 is unobtainable. okay then.
then we have the departure from R16 YMML:
…which inexplicable includes the entire route including the arrival runway.
how about the enroute section?
so… we fly back to runway 16 and start again? sure. why not?
then the approach:
mmhm. starting to see a pattern here. how about the arrival?
oh, back to YMML R16 again? i hope we tankered enough fuel! surely the missed approach will be correct, right? right?
wrong. it is not.
honestly, this game.
oh, and YPPH has ILS Z and ILS Y approaches to R21 – but not here:
notice the transitions are broken, with a column of empty boxes
here are the actual approaches, from a competing piece of software with is well written and works reliably:
OMG, thats crazy, I had to laugh because it is just so typical of Career mode and I would end up crying if I did not laugh!
A bit off-topic for this thread but… what? MSFS’s AIRAC is updated the day it releases, same as Navigraph’s (and SimBrief’s, with a Navigraph subscription). If you mean MSFS’s data doesn’t match SimBrief’s, that’s either because you don’t have a Navigraph subscription (so SimBrief is the one that is outdated) or the flight uses one or both airports that are not in the SimBrief database (this is common in Career, though less common in Airline Transport flights).
i’ve flown between multiple international airports where the SimBrief flightplan fails to import because Microsoft’s AIRAC has the wrong/outdated information. i have a Navigraph subscription. i trust Navigraph. i don’t trust Microsoft. simple as that.
The team at Working Title would be really interested to hear more details about that, I’m sure, as the sim takes quite a lot of pride in ensuring the navdata is 100% up to date and accurate to the real-world AIPs. Do you have any specific examples of this?
it’s happened several times recently, which is why i now use the sim’s own route, despite its manifold issues (taking off with a tailwind, landing with a tailwind, etc etc, ad nauseum). but thanks, it’s nice to know the sim takes a lot of pride in something.
So no specific examples then? 
what exactly are you implying, Zadma? and, as you kindly noted, this is off-topic. maybe move it to forums.flightsimulator.com/jumpingtodefend?
One could argue that having accurate navdata is pivotal to Career mode (and the simulator as a whole) - but DMs works fine for me, too.
This is worth posting an example on the WT Discord server. If you work with them they will probably be able to debug real-time and if there’s a sim bug, log it for a future fix.
after some thought/discussion, it’s likely a failure to import airways, rather than an actual AIRAC mismatch. i’ll be testing this some more.
meanwhile: you love to see it.
temporal anomaly enroute. inbound the Jurassic era.
seems legit.
later the same flight, on short final:
WASM crash! hurrah!
ya think?
If we had a LET 410, and DO228 I would probably be more interested in career mode with more airline phase one aircraft
Interesting you say that as it is what I’d want to get, given I bladdered it on 2020 in the FBW guise
I wasn’t aware you could buy the 320 though. I tried to find info online but only saw the 737
sorry about the HDR colourspace. screen capture doesn’t like it.
oh, also don’t buy the Saab. it is in a pitiable state. [MSFS2024] Saab 340B
the only issues with the iniBuilds A320neo v2.0 that i’ve encountered are:
EDIT: images uploaded to avoid uk geoblock by imgur.com
I can’t see your images
What region are you so I can VPN?
Says not available in my region
Hey guys, please see this topic
