There is absolutely nothing to do to receive a lot of fps until Microsoft optimizes the simulator much better. Right now I see 2 parts:
SMALL AIRPLANES (Cessna, etc): If the simulator only had small airplanes, it still would not be perfect, but enough because it has a really good performance with powerful graphics (With my 2080 TI, in New York city with a Cessna 152, all in ultra I get constant 60-70fps, without going down)
LARGE AIRCRAFT (a320, 747, 787): here is the big problem of the simulator, inside the cockpit of these planes stability is not achieved, it falls depending on where you are the fps. Taking New York as an example again, between 40 and 30 or less fps. This is where the simulator problem really lies
Clearly it has to improve all aspects, both small and large planes, but for now, the only solution I found to increase fps is to lower the DETAIL LEVEL OF THE TERRAIN (eat a lot of fps) and put the refreshment of the cokcpit monitors on LOW .
The simulator is really new, it came out earlier than expected because it has come out with many problems (mainly the performance one). You have to give it time, only time will put on your site if this simulator will improve or not. For now, we must trust Microsoft and trust that it will improve. It was also announced that VR will be released with the release of the HP Reverb G2 (and they will be released on 10/1/2020), so if this does not improve, neither VR will be able to move large planes in my opinion and it will be a disappointment for everyone.
My team (I put it down again to take into account)
- GPU: 2080 TI 11 GB OC Gigabyte
- CPU: Intel Core I7 8700K
- RAM: Corsair 32 GB CL15 3200 mhz
- MOTHERBOARD: Asus (I don’t remember model but it’s good)
Compared to the new cards, the 2080 TI and the 3080, they differ in many games, but there is hardly any difference with the simulator (5 fps or little more, and the 3080 is better). Apparently, the 3090 (a graph of 1500 euros), gains around 20 fps more than the 2080 TI and 10 fps more than the 3080 (we still need to do more analysis, these were leaks). This difference is bad, indicating that the simulator requires optimization

