Nice work Asobo, you made it
.
2 steps back, but hey, everyone needs Airports that out of service and other ■■■■.
Airports and planes do others for you. Your task is to improve the core. and you haven’t managed that in 11 updates. Bravo ![]()
Nice work Asobo, you made it
.
2 steps back, but hey, everyone needs Airports that out of service and other ■■■■.
Airports and planes do others for you. Your task is to improve the core. and you haven’t managed that in 11 updates. Bravo ![]()
It shows up on my tcas in PMDG using AIG TC
Didn’t look at vfr map but I took a screenshot further up this thread as another poster did, not sure if you are referring to just FSLTL but they do show up if using AIG
For that test only online traffic , the sim obviously picked up those aircraft in my community folder as they were AIG models
There is in the official folder files called Asobo generic aircraft , I think 6 folders depicting twin engine jets ie 787, 4 engine jets , 747 and piston aircraft and turbo prop aircraft
I had traffic set to about 100 and ground traffic set to fifty and I had show generic planes OFF but they still showed up
As a percentage about 80 % were using AIG models and the other twenty per cent were Generic 787s and Tbm, and the odd C172
Yes it is very strange that they do this
Meigs field I remember back in the day as one of my first airports from the fs 98 to FSX days
But I don’t need a defunct airport now
The A310 is an fps killer, so don’t fly it , too many planes and not enough to fix the core files
Sigh……
Best setup for me for now:
I changed in the aircraft.cfg of all Asobo Generic aircraft : IsAirTraffic = 1 to IsAirTraffic = 0
I changed one of my IVAO AI aircraft to icao_generic = 1 (in my case a B739 KLM) so that when MSFS isn’t able to match it uses that one.
I watched EHAM for one hour. I got al lot landing and departing traffic and a match ratio of about 85%. (Embraers, CRJ’s, A388 from IVAO MTL). No generic aircraft, so the 15% is filled bij the KLM B739.
With the 100% throttle problem, it’s almost as if the scale for throttle has been changed to =1 means 100% instead of 1% throttle. When they land, throttle drops to idle or =0 (not heard reversers yet). When they resume taxi, it’s back to 100%. Maybe a solution is throttle control via simconnect… how this is possible or if at all, I do not know.
Ok thanks. From what you report (and from what Woodstock says), indicates that PMDG is a special case.
It seems that PMDG have found a way to display AI offline traffic on their custom TCAS radar, when this same traffic does not show on the VFR Map.
Ps. FSLTL and AIG are both offline AI traffic and are therefore treated by the sim in exactly the same way.
pps. It would be great if you can confirm whether or not the en-route injected FSLTL traffic shows up on your VFR Map? (NB. when you are at cruise, and when the AI traffic has no common airport as you in its flight plan)
No problem will do a fight today and get back to you on the vfr map
I avoid generic planes in the following way:
Data live real-word air traffic - ON
Aircraft traffic type - OFF
Use generic aircraft models (AI traffic) - OFF
Traffic Variety - ULTRA
FSLT Injector - activated after opening the simulator AND BEFORE entering the world map.
Smooth takeoffs and landings.
This morning on KJFK. (FSLT / AIG)
What about model matching in this way?
mmmmmm so you’ve the injector running and live real world traffic. Sounds if that will give problems. In that case MSFS 2020 will inject trafiic from flightaware and FSLTL from FR24.
But I will give it a try..
What are your settings for FSLTL injector?
My apologies, I made a mistake writing the Aircraft traffic type - Online, I corrected it to off.
I have been doing other tests on KSFO KMIA KBOS KOAK and have not seen generic models.
…and continue below.
Yes with Offline and the injector only I got that too. But no landings in that case.
Interestingly with FSLTL injector and parked at KDCA watching traffic last night, in the space of 30 mins watching I saw plenty of takeoffs, and after a considerable delay maybe 3 or 4 landings (which was 3 or 4 more than I expected). Maybe the STARS all align for that airport ![]()
The thing I’m finding most annoying right now is the AI taxiing aircraft at what sounds like 100% N1. They scream out loud as they taxi about, which is very annoying and way louder than they were. I hope this gets fixed.
Sound other aircraft on 15 is less annoying
I’ll give that a try. But that will give quiet take offs too?
This FSLTL taken at gate from EGSS, more traffic in AIG and had a 747 cargolux land too
Personally I think AIG is better for landings as what arriving aircraft do is do a holding pattern as they are too high and then eventually come in to land
The FSLTL program is obviously great but , they don’t land and they get taken out before they get a chance to lose altitude
Silly question - but where are these .cfg files located?
They are in official folder, one store,Asobo generic, aircraft cfg
Haven’t tried it yet myself, let me know how it goes
Thanks! This shows exactly what I mean. Zero en-route AI traffic on the VFR Map!
The only traffic you see is parked on the ground at airports – plus one solitary aircraft that just departed from LCY.
ps. Later I will post a snapshot showing:
(a) the TCAS display;
(b) the VFR map;
(c) LittleNavMap (shows all the surrounding traffic)